Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59806
Return-Path: <yohgaki@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 6856 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2012 22:49:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 12 Apr 2012 22:49:33 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:42404] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id E3/26-00290-BFB578F4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:49:32 -0400
Received: by ghbg2 with SMTP id g2so1594503ghb.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=QykWxYNX9N8mkkcMo7eir5+JwZmxYn0zM1UgvkQXhJM=;
        b=pnaES05exDz4p1rAdiNCtgqsvvvgQjvDuDjgi8IH4EIjwrehQrcsbbret8CcWTrV6i
         lzc0cpzCRaEsWdZ8BL0AmPs+VNDbHdn51MDkm7vV+YS661u2bH2GK1151ZQtvXCmXCzJ
         bKKk0WqtrpVqn2nXpqSjORVD03px4lZjZQEm8ZC/H30hicnf0GZ0Mi+JskhMTuWvviIc
         +eK6rUgWp+R0U0U5Z2J+UcpN1gQs37mqdPckc0qjcIO74wqAOeD6FFl66nCER9Dim2Gy
         oGOschUY0aVnpYC/p6UuHRhbflU7fKP+Hs/V8qgjT1L6W1evePNvkSGL3f9cNUase+4k
         nIcw==
Received: by 10.236.161.3 with SMTP id v3mr3683472yhk.128.1334270968945; Thu,
 12 Apr 2012 15:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
Received: by 10.146.86.14 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F86761A.9010801@lsces.co.uk>
References: <CAGa2bXZ6G=Cphjrde3u1Mq3AAw-4yJk3s28vNe+Aybt2nGTumg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F850D06.10701@sugarcrm.com> <CAGa2bXZWrRh8RdMtKK_2_U_XmByC-O6hGRPrJyW5KwvE0CAK-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F8515AF.8060706@sugarcrm.com> <CAGa2bXZWudQeRm5h2eENGmgQDPfOqEmijB9-vPAvfKXLCfDiLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F851FE4.7000706@sugarcrm.com> <CAGa2bXbXdNcfHX_dM2EVVz_2JtS4cc+8pxneSLAd382TuQUg-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F8539E0.1090701@sugarcrm.com> <4F859063.1010401@lerdorf.com>
 <A633CF2D7C7BED41B41F1E64F25507B806A5CDD71A@MAILR001.mail.lan>
 <CAKOpQSz1=AFfWcO=F0Ot_2Jm8audczE2a1DnGV-vxhp=80ZcUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALKFbxs5irYW1Sdus4b=XBvbKqfsMkJbEd14RmXC7tFv7rg-fw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXb=RbjPaL=SeUv6vDv_Cvc0O5f_noNdZwue3gFcgnajAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKOpQSzN4xkJLL_JwbXx1iOJs6Hnxnjh+D2qUjpShqgW8N2S6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXaG_SR-F2eKUu3=Quzm6scOhOGB5d4gwZAmCBZTwB=q=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXbyhUGMSZsiP6hSap4fi0pVA8sKVeps4ScPb9QQWidkTg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F862AAC.90003@lerdorf.com> <4F86761A.9010801@lsces.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:48:47 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: -Sg77DyNkHpYgJWY9gWTDhtCSV8
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXZRuYWBeWRNkF5rbL1Drtt8uP2VeL4mCoXdxw8iswwEVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Disabling PHP tags by php.ini and CLI options
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

Hi,

2012/4/12 Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>:
> Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>>>
>>> If you think it costs too much still, please let me know.
>>
>> Pretty much all of the code I have ever written would break. I use
>> PHP-based templating everywhere and include my templates with
>> include/require. How exactly can I fix this with 3 lines of code?
>
>
> Nice to hear that I'm not alone in using 'simple' templating.
> I've also scanned a few of the sites I support, and it's quite surprising
> just how many STILL use short open tag!
> Once again - if people really want a 'programming language' will they please
> start a separate fork! Leave those of us who are happy with what we have
> with something that just works out of the box ( and even 'STRICT' is pigging
> annoying )

Then this RFC would be better RFC than the other.

This RFC encourage to write "<?php" at the top always while
other has special parameter and file extension for script only
files which will certainly lead full of "<?php"  less scripts.
We can use PHP for simple/efficient templating as it is now
and still can include third party library files since "<?php" will
be there.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net