Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59678 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89795 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2012 22:24:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Apr 2012 22:24:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.163 smtp163.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.163] ([67.192.241.163:53838] helo=smtp163.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 55/01-18401-613B48F4 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:24:22 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B0163270966; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:24:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp6.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 3CE882709A3; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:24:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F84B312.9000005@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:24:18 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: "ab@php.net" , David Soria Parra , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= , "internals@lists.php.net" References: <062d97234afa5d35f307cde3f3551a9d.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com> <7e6770a85f1256bf34b23ca78045831c.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com> <4F847D64.2070500@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Fileinfo fixes for windows From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > However, as you won't merge the tests fixes either, we won't 5.4.1's > tests at all to valid the build (way too many false positive), it does > not really matter anymore. Wait, are we talking about new test fixes or about tests that are broken in RC1 and need fixing? I was assuming it's the former but maybe I miss the point entirely. I've run tests of RC1 on Linux and those were just fine. If they fail somewhere else please tell me and I'll see if I should add those. I'm ok with pulling the LF fix, that seems innocent enough - it's not even a code change, just a metadata change. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227