Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59622
Return-Path: <flavius.as@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 27047 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2012 07:24:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 10 Apr 2012 07:24:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=flavius.as@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=flavius.as@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.42 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: flavius.as@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.42 mail-bk0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.214.42] ([209.85.214.42:39487] helo=mail-bk0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id C5/08-34074-530E38F4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:24:38 -0400
Received: by bkcje9 with SMTP id je9so4143510bkc.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version
         :to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=H5HNTbtvFIUmZhjOyuL8aigIEKUy/YzsDxnA7MWgX1w=;
        b=tCAerlGtS8mSa+k3akIS94pGtVzkIkcONy99ADzaUZUOz2EbwG9AvEQcQDo+Wdd86N
         4L135LKtPPO96tkJkF4SNgrOKlKoyG+DUOmrEanmzahwg02xEfxLdqM8Y+gla60RJS+I
         nN7YH0QDXhvnkBBW1Cy/P7yaUKSyBU9oVvmGqJ6JfpVFe8ctuhTFcS9ZbfnsxJjTlCGp
         402SGinI5yNOy2ZrxrmH9f9uMpXyTyJCioUxFg34zWf0bSDksBSxVmJYWafarw0+fbDH
         +GyKfCESY98GgZEopbBiuwNH0HmekTMv14ScUI/Kpyt3TjL8zRS/6Ic3R3/D4b9MXz0Q
         QUgg==
Received: by 10.204.156.206 with SMTP id y14mr4303072bkw.14.1334042674399;
        Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (chello080109207086.1.graz.surfer.at. [80.109.207.86])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u16sm33978500bkf.10.2012.04.10.00.24.32
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F83E02F.8030902@php.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:24:31 +0200
Reply-To: flavius@php.net
Organization: PECL
User-Agent: I am harmful. Fear me please :-) Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Luke Scott <luke@cywh.com>
CC: "flavius@php.net" <flavius@php.net>, 
 "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CBA4CE74.11C02%luke@cywh.com> <11343239.3338.1333757773882.JavaMail.mobile-sync@iakr3> <2087324446797252296@unknownmsgid> <4F82F6E9.7050900@php.net> <1366176333732756257@unknownmsgid>
In-Reply-To: <1366176333732756257@unknownmsgid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Persistent zvals
From: flavius.as@gmail.com (Flavius Aspra)

On 04/09/2012 10:30 PM, Luke Scott wrote:
> Yeah it would be. He also mentioned something about preloading
> framework classes.. Would like to hear his thoughts on that!

I also subscribe to the opinion of object persistency not being worth it. In an 
application server, you could probably achieve more by keeping the entire phar 
in RAM.

Currently, you can also simulate that by putting the phar on a ramdisk or similar.