Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59521 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34467 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2012 17:33:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Apr 2012 17:33:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johncrenshaw@priacta.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johncrenshaw@priacta.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain priacta.com designates 64.95.72.241 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johncrenshaw@priacta.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.95.72.241 mxout.myoutlookonline.com Received: from [64.95.72.241] ([64.95.72.241:55185] helo=mxout.myoutlookonline.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 39/00-34074-B7D138F4 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:33:49 -0400 Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E9E416E4D; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 13:33:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at mail.lan Received: from HUB025.mail.lan (unknown [10.110.2.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD84416D54; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 13:33:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MAILR001.mail.lan ([10.110.18.28]) by HUB025.mail.lan ([10.110.17.25]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 13:33:24 -0400 To: Tom Boutell , PHP Internals Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 13:33:33 -0400 Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] PHP class files without References: <4F80C739.2060404@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP class files without > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 12:43 PM, John Crenshaw = wrote: > > interoperability is somewhat reduced in the sense that all 3rd party=20 > > code would have to be checked for the =20 > I'm not sure what you mean by this part exactly? Suppose a code library is written and the author writes it without the