Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59508 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5659 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2012 15:43:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Apr 2012 15:43:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=luke@cywh.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=luke@cywh.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain cywh.com from 209.85.212.42 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: luke@cywh.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.42 mail-vb0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.212.42] ([209.85.212.42:33730] helo=mail-vb0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DD/C9-56433-EA3038F4 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:43:43 -0400 Received: by vbjk13 with SMTP id k13so2748721vbj.29 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 08:43:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=references:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=GE67MaxNZidlS9Zfu7gdxhyWXp4PjTSE0HdldB1sGTA=; b=F46Im30BV+7hu5/yLhMJ0xkSu+GwTv98fse68Sad5MuHVGBTVT7+hZY2Wf+Rjh5fwR /AxdX8w8Tyz6p2gjxxx6r1TI0I4eJqjzr5qWu0z6lfYU3zP+CXf8kR0+hfAWa+HLAHyx EDtn+CC+8TaHQi/nITov3XaQvrx/ZmURz3sITMmJgeCOO+GBubb0dWHiSGhJdOLp78mW ejerz9J58yEbodEUzEZsqEDxbdoYQvn9PTLy00pJuPJnjmWVbapDLaOc1LLM2M3RclWW csDmYvhBu39hNkHmEKf5mj+cPfKULO1vpEON7s9h+OQEyxuFzBu0tuR/tTeOzZIC98Pc as/A== Received: by 10.220.31.3 with SMTP id w3mr3864270vcc.21.1333986220465; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 08:43:40 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:43:37 -0700 Message-ID: <-5877502932356715576@unknownmsgid> To: Tom Boutell Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnfmsG3xOuR2yzqurEAMfMTLA0d9B0+MzdD9jWovuESfrTSXy4mAAbqxyDpRiDxY11WGnx5 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: source files without opening tag From: luke@cywh.com (Luke Scott) Tom, As I've said before I don't think new keywords are the answer. They will just pollute the language even further. I also don't think an ini setting is a bad thing either. It is often used in PHP as a way to transition from way of doing things to another. First you introduce it with it being off by default, then on by default, then deprecate the old behavior. It's quite normal in PHP's history. In another email someone mentioned doing two rfcs. In both cases are we talking about removing tag and treat text before the opening wrote: > I have written an RFC proposing backwards-compatible support for > source files without an opening > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/source_files_without_opening_tag > > This RFC is not yet listed at https://wiki.php.net/rfc. I am not sure > what the requirements are to get it added to the "Under Discussion" > session and get the ball rolling formally. Please enlighten and I'll > do whatever is required. > > Thanks! > > -- > Tom Boutell > P'unk Avenue > 215 755 1330 > punkave.com > window.punkave.com > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >