Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59463 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69607 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2012 15:03:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Apr 2012 15:03:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=foolistbar@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=foolistbar@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: foolistbar@googlemail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.170 mail-we0-f170.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.170] ([74.125.82.170:52741] helo=mail-we0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2F/52-56433-FC8A18F4 for ; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 11:03:44 -0400 Received: by werh12 with SMTP id h12so2587486wer.29 for ; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:03:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZLgDtPUpp47PpEcFGw+QClPl9CRzIRi7Sr2CS77vzhw=; b=F5c9vJWjx2LjsLX34mp1I00pmSJSipchxMgkpkPWv+upWrbQxbb2UrUpqzlj25ycwZ HkEHjh5hdAdHsFvJmMYHY9xb3TUV3qjmAuCreWyGCMI78F1u0oqyEuQ68ryla1BGJNFA yWkns57aN3aGUTUjMPxiGCmxz35vsV6MHCzvG0AluB9T0cF1koEc525MDCLbLO9rcj8J Gxf5cMr0BgZm3VKQLG7tAEctS/4XA1OEnJHQaLGwF7dCkBD7g1XDDgntQDhGXuU/76+w rqeZnuDjNeryOqoldAvG2t1sVBG4u7P3U6OJatsWy802vrFul/AQHmz8HgwBWERGWude EZAw== Received: by 10.180.107.132 with SMTP id hc4mr9449283wib.21.1333897419231; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:03:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.195] (host109-156-174-32.range109-156.btcentralplus.com. [109.156.174.32]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fz9sm22914525wib.3.2012.04.08.08.03.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F81A8C9.4080007@googlemail.com> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:03:37 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120310 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hannes Magnusson CC: PHP Development , Michael Maclean References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Tokyo/Kyoto Cabinet in 5.4 From: foolistbar@googlemail.com (Geoffrey Sneddon) On 30/09/11 12:37, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > Tokyo Cabinet support was added to ext/dba "recently".. but Tokyo > Cabinet is about to die these days, and getting replaced with Kyoto > Cabinet. > Shouldn't we drop tokyo cabinet support, before we ever make a stable > release with it, so we don't have to maintain it? > Preferably replace it with Kyoto Cabinet support I suppose. Is it actually dead? [1] still states: "I'll maintain the both of Tokyo Cabinet and Kyoto Cabinet because their values are different", as well as noting that Tokyo Cabinet is quicker in the single-threaded case. Given that both are maintained, as far as I can tell, as Tokyo Cabinet is quicker in the single-threaded case, as most PHP applications are, there is no reason to remove it. All for adding Kyoto Cabinet support, though. /gsnedders [1]: http://fallabs.com/kyotocabinet/spex.html