Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59288 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56532 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2012 03:23:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Apr 2012 03:23:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=brian@moonspot.net; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=brian@moonspot.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain moonspot.net designates 72.5.90.27 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: brian@moonspot.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 72.5.90.27 smtp.dealnews.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [72.5.90.27] ([72.5.90.27:52423] helo=smtp.dealnews.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 04/66-28591-74AC77F4 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:23:51 -0500 Received: (qmail 17989 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2012 03:23:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.dealnews.com) (10.1.10.7) by -H with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 1 Apr 2012 03:23:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 11863 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2012 03:23:41 -0000 Received: from 1.10.1.10.in-addr.arpa (HELO macdough.local) (brianm@10.1.10.1) by -H with ESMTPA; 1 Apr 2012 03:23:41 -0000 Message-ID: <4F77CA40.3020103@moonspot.net> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:23:44 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rasmus Lerdorf CC: Moriyoshi Koizumi , "internals@lists.php.net" References: <1A10A215-398D-4C79-A581-BE7B40CAFFED@lerdorf.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Removing PHP tags From: brian@moonspot.net (Brian Moon) Well played Moriyoshi. Well played. Brian. http://brian.moonspot.net On 3/31/12 10:02 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > On Mar 31, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote: > >> Ok, I'll try to fix that part. Thanks for the correction. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > > No problem. Keeping the April 1st RFCs factually accurate is a top priority around here. > > -Rasmus