Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59251 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29411 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2012 07:50:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Mar 2012 07:50:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.153 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.153 smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.153] ([67.192.241.153:38511] helo=smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FF/00-28591-F37B67F4 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 02:50:23 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id DEB7B5927B; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 03:50:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp5.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 15FBF58FDF; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 03:50:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F76B73B.2060005@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:50:19 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Shein CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4F75EA77.3010300@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Change all XFAIL tests to FAIL From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > 2) Keep devs' attention on known failures - XFAIL doesn't solve that. > You remember about them when you run tests and if you want make > attention at them. Which devs you are referring to? Why you assume their attention needs help? > What I propose is a single *daily* newsletter saying "Hey, guys! We > still have XFAIL bugs on 5.3 , 5.4 and master > . Bye!" That will make some pressure, especially if those > bugs have maintainers. I would not subscribe to this and would not read this. Would you? Why? We know we have technical debt. It's not a secret. What we need is not more harassment but more people fixing that debt. Spamming whole list with messages that nobody would read is not the solution. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227