Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59224
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 173.203.6.139 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4F756658.3040102@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:52:56 -0700
Organization: SugarCRM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt>
CC: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <4F755AFC.2040101@sugarcrm.com> <op.wby2zgoxidpuyk@slws007.slhq.int>
In-Reply-To: <op.wby2zgoxidpuyk@slws007.slhq.int>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4.1 RC1 Released
From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev)

Hi!

> I know this is controversial and some people have been committing to both  
> 5.3 and 5.4 NEWS files. However, we have clear guidance for this:

OK, we need to have specific policy on it, because I'm hearing people
having contradictory opinions on that.

> I think it would make more sense to change this rule and update all NEWS  
> files for stable branches as it would alleviate the RMs from the work of  
> determining which of the changes were 5.3 only, but either way we ought to  
> stick to one uniform rule. The status quo (some people updating one NEWS  
> file, others updating both) is not very satisfactory.

I know, I will update NEWS for final release, but I want to know what
policy we adopt - "lowest version" NEWS or "all stable branches" NEWS?

-- 
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227