Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59218 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 27114 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2012 06:15:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Mar 2012 06:15:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.113 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.113 smtp113.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.113] ([67.192.241.113:46148] helo=smtp113.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CB/E0-17229-D7F457F4 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:15:26 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp21.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8D579240406; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:15:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp21.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 3CD3E2403FB; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:15:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F754F70.8070107@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:15:12 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dirk Haun CC: PHP Internals References: <4F74DFF6.7010507@sugarcrm.com> <4F75048E.7050102@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Change all XFAIL tests to FAIL From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I was about to suggest that maybe PHP should have a rule: "no release > with failing tests". In current situation, this rule would be a bit shorter: "no release". > What's the point of a test that fails (or XFAILs)? Either something > is broken - then it should be fixed. Or the test makes no sense - > then it should be removed. You are completely right. Please fix it. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227