Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59132
Return-Path: <mike.php.net@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 1772 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2012 06:58:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 23 Mar 2012 06:58:16 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mike.php.net@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mike.php.net@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mike.php.net@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gx0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:44873] helo=mail-gx0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 40/45-16309-60F1C6F4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:58:15 -0500
Received: by ggmb2 with SMTP id b2so2732645ggm.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=yA4rDyTsSnnYWWrzOuPw+6zVVxrK9krRVgvKikBU8po=;
        b=Pbzp5nhJjCZAf1AsS3WlK/Wj6gdnDZseVb+XKPJ1w8urvQEBqb9AbeiZnew4GTx9FB
         oKuyLWlNEmhe7RQ2g3vC1Po8HzxMCi30nkViZx8vY6rVQPJxq0sn9txtc15TgCTx2aGa
         LyNIbK5uqd89XIC0EzqaItyY8oZLAp6vJDg/B/5Vk7HmIdaHjhFxOywZ4Bm66on3HJ1/
         5Q1es/Bph+CV3wxEbSvOpLnPblKYIkxfJMdd6WtaSIcR9XZ8irVP2HDPsvmlmx8U3+mp
         DqpEe9LAP7KXrSPHBwFckbpBvisModoZU0ptTg+Ig0rfkale5eAPsG4nyOob/MFhXINo
         WITQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.179.67 with SMTP id g43mr10884425yhm.66.1332485892460;
 Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mike.php.net@gmail.com
Received: by 10.100.151.14 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE4855161AC51@MBX202.domain.local>
References: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE4855161AC51@MBX202.domain.local>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 07:58:12 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: uJvVNDdCGyfwNVvcBS3aqvZagHA
Message-ID: <CALJZF3gcj0q-oiGCGM+F9TVyqWbwiTBf2=hvfmeND0a_i1ukNQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Clint M Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Accessors v2.4 Proposed Changes
From: mike@php.net (Michael Wallner)

Hi Clint,

On 22 March 2012 20:00, Clint M Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com> wrote:
> Does anyone else have any comments about this RFC (as-implemented)?

I need time, probably longer than the weekend, to review your RFC,
to be able to say anything seriously.

Generally, I was against the idea of accessors, when you brought it
first up, but in the meantime I have relativized my objection.

Let's see.

-- 
Regards,
Mike