Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59091
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F68E101.1010303@sugarcrm.com>
References: <slrnjmgm8f.mfm.dsp@experimentalworks.net>
	<CAKxcST_VqXXaxHvLhnxd6ata-RMboF4kCZzCSRdQJQF0hWRZkw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKOpQSykJTJbiwCh7Y3FJsM5LAp1sCgK4W33et8jzsMWbsv1fA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F68BFBA.1050605@gmx.net>
	<CAKOpQSzS-pAxJ_WpU7sWru8aGA712RcL5Ky0UCsuFSDp8S_u5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADh7vovLQX9nJhmbdjCQeJHKimxpYnjucKGLX2PTnhv6F14Bmw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKOpQSxwhpxbs0ebSoz_c=77_9mfCmv8NmB=ZMuH46wbrYmp1w@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F68E101.1010303@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:14:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKOpQSy_xPus9K=r3SEKx+G=LXLRxrE7jjh_S=Xr1wdBxDUg+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d63ebaf9f77f04bbb25303
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Github Pull Request
From: kris.craig@gmail.com (Kris Craig)

--0016e6d63ebaf9f77f04bbb25303
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > Yeah I know.  That doesn't mean I have to like it though lol.  ;P
>
> You may like it or not like it, but it's established terminology so
> we're going to use it. Let's not add noise to our lists.
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> (408)454-6900 ext. 227
>

If we don't critically re-examine "established" ideas now and then, who
will?  You can disagree with me, but please don't belittle other people's
concerns by dismissing them as "noise."  I raised a legitimate concern that
was not "unworthy" of discussion.  Just because I hold a minority viewpoint
doesn't make it any less valid and I stand by my posts.  Ironically, your
dismissive comment after the fact only increased the "noise" factor by at
least two more posts.

I believe that the majority, including Github, is wrong on this.  That term
is needlessly confusing in my opinion.  I made that point and it didn't
gain any traction, so like I said I'll just have to suck it up and move
on.  But if you're going to jump in with a, "We're gonna do it this way so
shut up," then all that's going to do is create animosity and drag this out
since obviously I"m not about to let such a comment go unchallenged.  ;P

If you want to keep beating this dead horse, I'm game.  Otherwise, all the
arguments have already been made so just let it go.  I voiced my concern
and the majority doesn't share it, so that's that.  Time to move on.

--Kris

--0016e6d63ebaf9f77f04bbb25303--