Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59035 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 46498 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2012 17:22:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Mar 2012 17:22:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dsoria@gmx.net; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dsoria@gmx.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.net designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dsoria@gmx.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.165.64.22 mailout-de.gmx.net Received: from [213.165.64.22] ([213.165.64.22:59977] helo=mailout-de.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 12/D1-36598-A3B676F4 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:22:03 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2012 17:21:56 -0000 Received: from p4FE3A703.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.23.101]) [79.227.167.3] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 19 Mar 2012 18:21:56 +0100 X-Authenticated: #235172 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19Bsqp+oyNBFt8t/hz6U89XfeBFRIofLzEi/yxOlV 3GuaDUTXBN0yiv Message-ID: <4F676B2D.1070102@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:21:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120131 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Schick CC: David Soria Parra , internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php-src is now on git From: dsoria@gmx.net (David Soria Parra) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/19/2012 06:16 PM, Simon Schick wrote: > 2012/3/19 David Soria Parra : Hi, David > > Thanks for this great step! > > As I quickly viewed into the github-repository I recognized the > big list of branches ... 52 is quite a big list .. > > I don't know if someone asked just that before: Are there plans > reducing this list? Branches (at least to me) seems to be something > like big features, bugfixes or releases that are or could actively > be developed in the future. One step is for example closing all the > php-4.x branches and leave them as tagged open-end if changes are > not merged ... absolutly. We carrying around a lot of branches since 2001. Neither gwynne nor I wanted to remove the branches. People with full repository access are free to cleanup the branches and tags if they are sure that they are not longer needed. I personally dont think i am in the position to judge which branch or tag to delete and which not. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPZ2stAAoJEAT0aMuPE7Z1awoQAKLRXhY8BHbHoIbCmbO0vz/p 7LC5WdhiQ8HLp73HpmMf/jzS6D2+8nIOCKGi4cs1tht6nqG9IqKPZRTly+XY1Bu+ KOEysrbb1/OFBSl0B2ks+KiIrS5wVvWwkfHrNcEHsE/kdUdlRT73S3k5gkHN/fzo CLC0eZ+V/x6Tbd2Uf/nzS8ZM4b/2KdGnUCJw08nKsU5MmeUt85zTsRTAunaBzUQy cSiVCEFJ7TMyWTPGBECXtMu+dUJFlmjcLSRe7kFyZ1YHgX7b2WZHNi4OkLrAK5Kl ypFCr7wgHhTsR9/C3+ZzPD4BRJJvLfCWxHJz4qWl8j4fJ2SBLoHsvv/Q4alruhGY Z0D7HsySZgh1iCfDYXslzSY7HAkfUGLZtVh2L8ezPrCeZ+GO4aHMiQwsEbnq5G4Z NOxTR5HQBmyB2j+bc5Gsc63dxcDnySpBlmvh1XxZBYX1mSyLAlz/XzKsFpPTKOJr I4x8eA/qf449sCMr19+m3Evy6T6uGgzEwOKuer2+K086UIfbubL12hiS29Dj5IYN XjGcRFBHtCrGQXHNfSvMe+A3HRVCzx5Qu5UjjVm9L93+h2mn7Ix8e7bS9LAlMj3n KZ7SHCQGoL+WknYJOfr2YFurXUgM+3n4g/beXjVbHGE88IYTaS+7f5hUtIwLMHUM Ase72LeLJxIkN78pXCst =IPhy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----