Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58993 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79195 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2012 05:56:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Mar 2012 05:56:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tjerk.meesters@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tjerk.meesters@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tjerk.meesters@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:48075] helo=mail-gx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9B/21-63274-419756F4 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 00:56:36 -0500 Received: by ggmb2 with SMTP id b2so5682247ggm.29 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:56:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+OUhuCltpM1eiX+EnZxRrqzYzO7gpofLPwDIkcgU2qc=; b=PGxs6seLYV/flJHoA6smLzeMjEU3OxsZrkOoFOALkVbrp35n906oRcELXfkA3Zxw0z yhFHq/T3JOZVVRA+GujUCzU2ANdc/MbJ+H4Wya3VSPzWAvsgMZONIfEIhJ71ToeEoX/j Lqpuw3k5B3I+V9pEQHRqe1YbIovPVImQXyoNs18sK+Z1fnDQYSM8xxy3gco5irVj8hAJ K2EseLZYMBHIF3qOtkJVGjT4wlmmrwtNpoJJj6CfyIC1TUHMlKB6E+lzP5wchovHniD8 9UaU+N2U6NYnGkF46cEmrSvIxVvtc0hzH+FdbfsVCukNT8t/BFEiLRSnX/0hMCcz5o2Q ou7w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.184.8 with SMTP id r8mr8090374yhm.110.1332050193283; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tjerk.meesters@gmail.com Received: by 10.147.146.6 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:56:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F652868.7070901@sugarcrm.com> References: <4F65267D.3040005@googlemail.com> <4F652868.7070901@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:56:33 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: RXaSY5p9BAulQH-8q_Lv0Y0wsKk Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: Sam , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Randomize hash-function in php From: datibbaw@php.net (Tjerk Anne Meesters) On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Obvious solution would be to use a salt for the hash, which prevents blind > pre-computing of hash collisions. However, due to the fact that PHP hash > values can be reused in different processes by bytecode caches, implementing > it properly is not trivial. What if php uses salts for specific hashes only, such as GPC (or all hashes whose lifetime is limited to the current reuqest), and use a zero-value salt for all others?