Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58852
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOfKkdROb1PBQq+9UA0o+JXxpzvED6AOD1=uHPiNn7tQsUzmfA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOfKkdQMOgxBmKSo3DHaJZeHFe4fAOzg8a7amA9_--1=CeSBjA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F5C5540.8010204@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAOfKkdROb1PBQq+9UA0o+JXxpzvED6AOD1=uHPiNn7tQsUzmfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:39:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKOpQSyhnN0bHDO8LH83a1t9h1uOgPT5ePdG9n0-WHA4JWtj5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pierrick Charron <pierrick@webstart.fr>
Cc: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044304ec7a45c604bb04556c
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Upgrade cURL extension
From: kris.craig@gmail.com (Kris Craig)

--f46d044304ec7a45c604bb04556c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I think waiting until PHP++ is probably the best approach.  It would've
been nice to have the current libcurl version in 5.4.0, but since we're not
talking about any critical bug/security fixes, I don't think it's that big
a deal either way.  So we may as well just sit on it for now.

--Kris


On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Pierrick Charron <pierrick@webstart.fr>wrote:

> I thought about it but I think it may confuse people to have two
> different extensions with the same name, same interface, but one in
> pecl and one in the core package (the difference between the 2
> versions are not that big). Also as ilia mentioned if someone already
> have the original version, they will have symbol conflicts. So I guess
> we could just wait until PHP next unless someone have an other nice
> solution which will not confuse people :)
>
> Thanks all for your input.
>
> Pierrick
>
> On 11 March 2012 03:33, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> >> I wanted to make this new version available in PHP5.4 but
> >> unfortunately I did finish my work when it was already in RC phase.
> >> The question now is should we include this new version in PHP5.4.1 or
> >> should we wait for PHP 5.5/6/7 or whatever PHP next will be. There is
> >> no feature break (AFAIK) so all the previous code should work as
> >> expected. You'll find the list of new features attached and the last
> >> code in the trunk branch.
> >
> >
> > Can't you make it also available as pecl extension, which could be built
> on
> > 5.4? This way people could enjoy the benefits of your work without stable
> > branch being disrupted and BC problems raised.
> >
> > --
> > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> > (408)454-6900 ext. 227
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--f46d044304ec7a45c604bb04556c--