Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58845 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70810 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2012 21:55:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Mar 2012 21:55:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mike.php.net@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mike.php.net@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mike.php.net@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:64485] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 35/37-24751-74F1D5F4 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:55:19 -0500 Received: by ghbg2 with SMTP id g2so2280483ghb.29 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:55:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BReGhyxmRWntn4GplfUD697U13WbHVHF1kU6cR+7AF4=; b=CKQH+BvD8CmONsySsgay8TqzHoErIUM8C7uk3DXvLwwHKuNW+qMVtFrcH7HBK3BHkX RWDpo5Wvw4nRW3bN5QBa6wYk8WZ+eQnrfzTFQz5l/3ajscmzgCdLTV+kTObnrWuWNyT/ v5OG9dLQ+eqdqY14MZDdWNc2AwAD8RSix4K2BEKsS/voPjmyviPhAtDvlmiGSfEXUtxa /Fv0NWlvBb4pJ/GuX217Eac1RLr2ADtnoxUE04tzlPUUj3rA7wZ0nmW4nQrrzqUyAgV2 V2xlh1t+yjMZBX1Lg93qBIyq+bqvhvgJbucLzg+bt7KMSyMHlDw1hmtxObQkExNlnMRy zCIg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.161.232 with SMTP id w68mr10863576yhk.56.1331502916382; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mike.php.net@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.57.6 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:55:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F5D09E5.3040008@gmail.com> References: <4F54ED5B.2010101@fedoraproject.org> <4F54EF64.6040208@fedoraproject.org> <4F58DA17.9030000@fedoraproject.org> <4F5D09E5.3040008@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:55:16 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: s64TqTd407ZHIDIG_6l0b3yG9Eg Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?w4FuZ2VsIEdvbnrDoWxleg==?= Cc: Adam Harvey , Remi Collet , PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] hash / tiger regression in PHP 5.4.0 From: mike@php.net (Michael Wallner) > It'd be worse to keep the wrong behavior, providing as tiger what it is not. > What can be done is to add a "tiger192,3-broken php5.4" hash for BC of > those which may have used the new one. > It's serious enough so I'd consider it a factor for a new minor in short > time, but not for setting in stone a wrong behavior. wat? The new hashes are correct. I'm awfully sorry that there has been so much trouble with the tiger hashes, but it happened and cannot be undone. -- Regards, Mike