Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58839 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 99846 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2012 07:33:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Mar 2012 07:33:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.193 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.193 smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.193] ([67.192.241.193:49637] helo=smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E1/B0-26398-3455C5F4 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 02:33:24 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1F6E33C8376; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 03:33:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp19.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id C971A3C835E; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 03:33:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F5C5540.8010204@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:33:20 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierrick Charron CC: Internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Upgrade cURL extension From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I wanted to make this new version available in PHP5.4 but > unfortunately I did finish my work when it was already in RC phase. > The question now is should we include this new version in PHP5.4.1 or > should we wait for PHP 5.5/6/7 or whatever PHP next will be. There is > no feature break (AFAIK) so all the previous code should work as > expected. You'll find the list of new features attached and the last > code in the trunk branch. Can't you make it also available as pecl extension, which could be built on 5.4? This way people could enjoy the benefits of your work without stable branch being disrupted and BC problems raised. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227