Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58785 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 51315 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2012 16:05:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Mar 2012 16:05:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dmgx.michael@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dmgx.michael@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dmgx.michael@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.170 mail-we0-f170.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.170] ([74.125.82.170:46645] helo=mail-we0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 36/88-00152-1C8D85F4 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:05:22 -0500 Received: by werh12 with SMTP id h12so498770wer.29 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:05:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uyRG9IzAM+OCVJL2NkLvGgElkRUyJDCTHaYyW0NhOQA=; b=IMiRofQtGxQF+SuG/1xb+e/nIYjho2AmvLTnc5SVFVQQUeGbOTDaBUHYQAeemsWAUt XVgcVAlN+r14LUhY6R+7T7Qn5LtB+4oio+rxaOqhrPcoVtjsJsVziwlpBVXzIY22LzY4 rP1CilIYEladN0bocGKjdRpZ0Ijqih9e7TqutRj4m2sTLv/6UQaCzMdmhr/Mda7jI8Gp fftT5+3+A9V05Fdg0oLO1pB4xDKQY95X2WO+WB+cKcfQO7h0PebpNz/Vtkst5q7ekf1z uWaCSgNz7ho/wZ50AhW7FB2KcWP3z777hs2vQdf1hIROCsCTLVjFJ5tq3Zgk8b11wcgT 10Ew== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.137.163 with SMTP id y35mr3489894wei.33.1331222719173; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:05:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.51.68 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:05:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:05:19 -0500 Message-ID: To: PHP Internals List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Specify namespace to include file into. From: dmgx.michael@gmail.com (Michael Morris) https://wiki.php.net/rfc/changes_to_include_and_require Since the reaction to the first of the two suggestions was largely negative I've withdrawn it for now to focus on the second of the two changes. In all honestly, these two suggestions should have had independent RFC's from the start. Of the two suggestions this one has the more profound implications to the language even if it is simpler to implement. Thoughts?