Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58756
Return-Path: <keisial@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 49536 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2012 21:32:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 7 Mar 2012 21:32:49 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=keisial@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=keisial@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: keisial@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.54 mail-ww0-f54.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.54] ([74.125.82.54:42138] helo=mail-ww0-f54.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 53/8B-15180-104D75F4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 16:32:49 -0500
Received: by wgbdq13 with SMTP id dq13so5603922wgb.11
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:32:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type;
        bh=dcFJWqbJIvWYNTAfYltEdP+PohFeip+Ui3MFYaXISvY=;
        b=BaDIEv9cuQ2npxmC9OW4H+PxDhX6/j4qR2dqXD5Yin3jCMPCBihHfwCjNxWZ6LsL8r
         l+Mei27dmaV0gnOJLYmDw4vJ5qd8dUPG+qO7vdQilYzSk7EN3hQW+KeqrBmHhN3UarJW
         f+NyNXn3Mf9ZYjBLLxoFBu0mhbMwu3XQbILoMvqB1kXsXO/6NhQ7lAPoymAUdoIYYRrs
         YLKY+llEkM50q/H2ZqTJ0OPJlCKc/D12MYndRhSe0xTxCPLxnmIXJZUh3pr+Mmt/ENyb
         uO5ndn4YCASVXX44hhT0EHGe7UJ1rw7N+1bNEi3z88CCIDGuNuAL18265H/1irxyiLuA
         k0Wg==
Received: by 10.180.79.135 with SMTP id j7mr26031667wix.19.1331155966620;
        Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:32:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.26] (89.Red-83-41-242.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net. [83.41.242.89])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j3sm21942032wiw.1.2012.03.07.13.32.44
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:32:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F57D526.6020807@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 22:37:42 +0100
User-Agent: Thunderbird
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com>
CC: PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <4F54C488.6050209@lsces.co.uk> <CA+Ky_uPMrT_U3kvdJ7D6HzaSzdSp80Bb+kFex=NhWFk9F7Y97Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKOpQSyaG3tJCS2MT5f0HFa13Vw1zkBWLPRNMcNXUM5-1b-amw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJzDObciKmLEQ8VkH5na1TA__hRfhLApBbAVjrx4RC3OVnwzeA@mail.gmail.com> <CAORXhGL7se8THD3_XZPabSe0H1xBTF16ypu9CxjrFMvCD9TU=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKOpQSzYRBFcsmmZmEd3sucYe7UpdMEOsSh1F+f8b_yTXXBBMg@mail.gmail.com> <4F555631.7090305@thelounge.net> <CAKOpQSxJuRx3PyTNcCh=FhvxNom8zwtzdz3NrCys6TbX6ThMzg@mail.gmail.com> <4F55F5E7.3080506@thelounge.net> <CAKOpQSwGuVAWznVmeCU2M-4LKO8w8F480hjaSrniM0F7sXfEvw@mail.gmail.com> <4F5686C5.1030900@gmail.com> <CAKOpQSykSzxOrF3RV0-4ovVKUXa16+DXwRHafwjE-OzF44zpwQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKOpQSykSzxOrF3RV0-4ovVKUXa16+DXwRHafwjE-OzF44zpwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------050801040305000208050803"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] '<?=' with PHP5.3.10
From: keisial@gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1ngel_Gonz=E1lez?=)

--------------050801040305000208050803
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

El 07/03/12 00:15, Kris Craig wrote:
>
>     > To clarify again, I was under the mistaken impression that <?=
>     was a new
>     > alias for short_open_tag.  My argument was (and still is) against
>     > short_open_tag.  I do see some use in this new echo alias for
>     templating
>     > purposes.
>     >
>     > --Kris
>     <?= has been there for ages, since PHP 3.
>
>
> ....And your point is?  I initially thought this thread was saying
> that this alias had been removed and instead made to replace the
> short_open_tag.  I stood corrected and we moved on.  What does PHP 3
> have to do with any of this?  I think you've officially crossed the
> line from correcting somebody's error to beating a dead horse.  ;P
>
> --Kris
Sorry. I understood from your mail that you didn't know <?= and you
thought it was an addition aliasing <?


--------------050801040305000208050803--