Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58695 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85993 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2012 22:08:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Mar 2012 22:08:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dmgx.michael@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dmgx.michael@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dmgx.michael@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.170 mail-we0-f170.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.170] ([74.125.82.170:56259] helo=mail-we0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C5/31-15021-DDA865F4 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:08:30 -0500 Received: by werh12 with SMTP id h12so4046947wer.29 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:08:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dmgx.michael@gmail.com designates 10.180.85.69 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.85.69; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dmgx.michael@gmail.com designates 10.180.85.69 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dmgx.michael@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=dmgx.michael@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.85.69]) by 10.180.85.69 with SMTP id f5mr27311584wiz.18.1331071706972 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:08:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lm0/2aS132lEsA7Vje7Wdl8kd7CAIwVRZm9Wff2tHkA=; b=Q3937IHwqgRsPKJXaCrLnMb2gkXGy9JI2g+K9gRVrcqk8rNq370jch2I5l1f5AdkTu ZDXuaObITajttgmLv1fxCys9AgNUIcWN08UEgDE9qsdFoqM26SeWXgT24jrMQSiAjsCq T9Cr2Dws3eGwNn15L5qYcW38pNGiFJYHTDki8wWsyVp/CX/XTleE3/HI33z1bKGDv9Bo pqfcxc8PuOF5OKajOzQsrDsc6aT0yi7tdhDrIikecfe2uvdBtHFEB/4NLPrjejwTAm0o 2bEkY4o3p+t5BUDbQ515kgDSxpVtDTw72kqB9pbmPAXN4dB2EURJOXN+IewVV9ORsHw1 NhGw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.85.69 with SMTP id f5mr21618820wiz.18.1331071706853; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:08:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.51.68 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 14:08:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F5689B0.7020709@gmail.com> References: <4F5689B0.7020709@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:08:26 -0500 Message-ID: To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1ngel_Gonz=E1lez?= Cc: PHP Internals List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Namespace and Parse tags on Include and Require From: dmgx.michael@gmail.com (Michael Morris) 2012/3/6 =C1ngel Gonz=E1lez : > Tagless files interpreted as php is the wrong way to go. > I think you should instead propose it as: > * A file included in that mode MUST begin with * ?> is forbidden in such mode unless followed by EOF. > > Ever work with older versions of subversion or vi? (Many editors will put a carriage return after the last character of the file). So no, you're wrong. Requiring ?> at EOF would just be stupid.