Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58689
Return-Path: <keisial@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 77711 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2012 21:46:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 6 Mar 2012 21:46:07 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=keisial@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=keisial@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: keisial@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.170 mail-we0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.170] ([74.125.82.170:37242] helo=mail-we0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 12/3F-32184-F95865F4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:46:07 -0500
Received: by werh12 with SMTP id h12so4034572wer.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:46:04 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of keisial@gmail.com designates 10.216.139.204 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.216.139.204;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of keisial@gmail.com designates 10.216.139.204 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=keisial@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=keisial@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.216.139.204])
        by 10.216.139.204 with SMTP id c54mr6959962wej.103.1331070364846 (num_hops = 1);
        Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:46:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Jf8FFShzgy2ZhaNpsKqdddFZMCYgT1NwTuwZ8GZckp0=;
        b=OO0kriwtPfLdqqKMPK9nkxU9L+65F0aE/QM+XC6sRMWM2cP2yYncHXcmyTkjCa0hm9
         wIiQtWsEm7bsy0h/WLJxu8y7fbvow42u1jmIs8Y4fs50s/nfvp6URy3p5OiHg4y2F4AE
         vgfdVY900WuA2Iq+Z/iuVGMTKcBz0u1XGgOvLIAzpIKdMMFZSpsI8WOjL86ShePEGsj+
         B3/GKUWZSF3eWa7TZFosJcQfBmEoTjGVdS5BAsULEdekibArhnp89mrfmIfLsOFdZtII
         eMar5te/G3CQzHfetTJ7c4gcTdcdrovr2/obpEwAnl4mMevIpt70gq/lbJRLyROPtx3L
         xD9w==
Received: by 10.216.139.204 with SMTP id c54mr5572325wej.103.1331070364721;
        Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:46:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.26] (86.red-80-28-65.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net. [80.28.65.86])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s8sm31182572wiz.8.2012.03.06.13.46.03
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:46:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F5686C5.1030900@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:51:01 +0100
User-Agent: Thunderbird
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com>
CC: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>, internals@lists.php.net
References: <4F54C488.6050209@lsces.co.uk> <CA+Ky_uPMrT_U3kvdJ7D6HzaSzdSp80Bb+kFex=NhWFk9F7Y97Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKOpQSyaG3tJCS2MT5f0HFa13Vw1zkBWLPRNMcNXUM5-1b-amw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJzDObciKmLEQ8VkH5na1TA__hRfhLApBbAVjrx4RC3OVnwzeA@mail.gmail.com> <CAORXhGL7se8THD3_XZPabSe0H1xBTF16ypu9CxjrFMvCD9TU=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKOpQSzYRBFcsmmZmEd3sucYe7UpdMEOsSh1F+f8b_yTXXBBMg@mail.gmail.com> <4F555631.7090305@thelounge.net> <CAKOpQSxJuRx3PyTNcCh=FhvxNom8zwtzdz3NrCys6TbX6ThMzg@mail.gmail.com> <4F55F5E7.3080506@thelounge.net> <CAKOpQSwGuVAWznVmeCU2M-4LKO8w8F480hjaSrniM0F7sXfEvw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKOpQSwGuVAWznVmeCU2M-4LKO8w8F480hjaSrniM0F7sXfEvw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] '<?=' with PHP5.3.10
From: keisial@gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1ngel_Gonz=E1lez?=)

On 06/03/12 19:36, Kris Craig wrote:

<nitpicking mode="on">

>> FIRST:
>> do NOT top post after get a reply below your text
>> or how do you imagine that anybody can follow a
>> thread where answers randomly before and after
>> the quotet text?
> Sorry.  Sometimes I forget that there are some people out there who still
> use legacy non-threaded inboxes.  I would recommend you consider switching
> to Gmail or some other email client/service that supports threaded views.
> That will make it a lot easier for you to follow these threads.  =)
Threaded MUAs won't help when fragments appear as
3
1
2
4

In such cases, the people breaking the thread convention should
the very least remove all the other content.
And yes, his MUA does support threading.

</nitpicking>


> To clarify again, I was under the mistaken impression that <?= was a new
> alias for short_open_tag.  My argument was (and still is) against
> short_open_tag.  I do see some use in this new echo alias for templating
> purposes.
>
> --Kris
<?= has been there for ages, since PHP 3.