Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58635
Return-Path: <kris.craig@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 10078 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2012 00:13:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 6 Mar 2012 00:13:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=kris.craig@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=kris.craig@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.170 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: kris.craig@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.170 mail-wi0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.212.170] ([209.85.212.170:45064] helo=mail-wi0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 42/22-34145-2B6555F4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:13:39 -0500
Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so2095778wib.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:13:35 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kris.craig@gmail.com designates 10.180.92.229 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.92.229;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kris.craig@gmail.com designates 10.180.92.229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kris.craig@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=kris.craig@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.92.229])
        by 10.180.92.229 with SMTP id cp5mr18931222wib.8.1330992815945 (num_hops = 1);
        Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:13:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=rCQykLORjOkUYb0myU6nBBcjkMuHnPkyqY2fi6wK4D4=;
        b=nSjFT9KKUCVf/oa89skIhX3I9qySKupvCrX06vlNUKVSj+dRHyC0ad58BSNSf3UkuM
         Yc9JMJyOLWxNjh431PZZ/3CWxLvXrPaSfxA6Df9hT08EmEJhOvvac06L/1PkU9FGKvZE
         OKK3oj2WH9oXfNPHikT0MBAQxTBopBvU29cxVp8+UsWk3ZvRjhaYHK4Jb+9k3xTbTcwn
         o5AfraKgrPRN8+f0+12z+TisMBkcFc9tXw+hEN0RtPryjoSL0TgNb0AYiXX5xStxUuBV
         ve66M+n4FZwd9SOSn12nS7jJWYn1+HVsav533JIoALTGMaRCW7QMZlvmjCS/lFfiwGr7
         J0Pw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.92.229 with SMTP id cp5mr15010775wib.8.1330992815853; Mon,
 05 Mar 2012 16:13:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.111.78 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:13:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4F555631.7090305@thelounge.net>
References: <4F54C488.6050209@lsces.co.uk>
	<CA+Ky_uPMrT_U3kvdJ7D6HzaSzdSp80Bb+kFex=NhWFk9F7Y97Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKOpQSyaG3tJCS2MT5f0HFa13Vw1zkBWLPRNMcNXUM5-1b-amw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJzDObciKmLEQ8VkH5na1TA__hRfhLApBbAVjrx4RC3OVnwzeA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAORXhGL7se8THD3_XZPabSe0H1xBTF16ypu9CxjrFMvCD9TU=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKOpQSzYRBFcsmmZmEd3sucYe7UpdMEOsSh1F+f8b_yTXXBBMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F555631.7090305@thelounge.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:13:35 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKOpQSxJuRx3PyTNcCh=FhvxNom8zwtzdz3NrCys6TbX6ThMzg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c094efcd1d304ba87e9bf
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] '<?=' with PHP5.3.10
From: kris.craig@gmail.com (Kris Craig)

--f46d043c094efcd1d304ba87e9bf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Windows (where I generally do most of my scripting grunt work), I
typically use Notepad++ and it highlights <?php just fine.

--Kris


On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>wrote:

>
>
> Am 06.03.2012 01:03, schrieb Kris Craig:
> > I've never understood the "it's easier to read" argument since I've found
> > it to be exactly the opposite.  The <? as opposed to <?php, at least for
> > me, makes it more difficult to "at a glance" see where the PHP code
> begins
>
> if you hvae a usebale editor <?=$whatever?> would become different colors
> only in notepad or on the shell you would not see php-code but
> who does develop this way these days?
>
>

--f46d043c094efcd1d304ba87e9bf--