Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58604 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67789 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2012 16:20:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Mar 2012 16:20:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.170 mail-yx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.170] ([209.85.213.170:62910] helo=mail-yx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 24/86-35539-3D7E45F4 for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:20:36 -0500 Received: by yenl5 with SMTP id l5so1934649yen.29 for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:20:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of pierre.php@gmail.com designates 10.101.135.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.101.135.32; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of pierre.php@gmail.com designates 10.101.135.32 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=pierre.php@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.101.135.32]) by 10.101.135.32 with SMTP id m32mr8573604ann.84.1330964432518 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:20:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DBmFnyz0Sn0hkNh1H762MyHSRGx6H+Vd6jwyhiqLyQQ=; b=PlDrZgRZ3O6I99614UH3yIoY2aQrPiZHnEaLFFwTmIvmQ7mtNfxa3w1wuaSSOn3lp0 qm1BgKnBIWcA3oWlBayES9SN6pggiO1wQUmT5s0+21e67aKJZiF/0kMv9EQKG2UXFDSp VopIoOGT1A1DqAO8+seyPKaVtI+QIgvErXgrybnCIFnJTjYCKcgHI07eKfZaEn2HXUEj PLWS+szxg7vZp/FrzGVyebBYbvd3ks10NKch2LoyM3Rxk7tUSWr9Gm4douybTfpOzQiM CVn42RNlLlaEsa+5Tg7GZec33X5T0vHNxhm2r4YkhJpyPK6emjb+EMIjobS0zNvqb0vx F4pg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.135.32 with SMTP id m32mr6754056ann.84.1330964432464; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:20:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.146.221.14 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:20:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 17:20:32 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Matthew Weier O'Phinney" Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] discussions, about a 5.3 EOL From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi Matthew, On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > Considering that 5.3 adoption is still eclipsed by 5.2 adoption, to be > honest, it feels like doing 1 year bugfix + 1 year security fix is the > minimum necessary. By the time we get good adoption of 5.3, it will > already be EOL'd. :-/ Please consider the high level (to do not say almost 100%) of compatibility of PHP 5.4 with 5.3. This is a much lower jump than from 5.2 to 5.3. The same will apply to 5.4+1. With a good communication, and we need you guys from the apps&frameworks areas, we will surely reduce the adoption time frame between releases. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org