Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58555
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.170 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kris.craig@gmail.com designates 10.180.80.71 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.80.71;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1330823743.2138.6.camel@guybrush>
References: <cvs-account-2566@php.net>
	<CAKOpQSxaTvC0uAdDB=LDtJHoR1bekgx9RZ0NmTME1Ej1ZMS5Gw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH5a_PgVm6+Ei51oAZgFKvz-Uj038G5P-WyeNS31F4CYtg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKOpQSzrcFngjYWmRZ4cc1qaBNxzXjEGHwcHwu822g=+Myy-gQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH4_CC=HcngR9gFWqWASB9ZVWV_wo7ocGG21Hm7euyybfw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKOpQSwzTCaBUnzU806YWUweDw+HUR5ubRSWJaxD15wde_N3Jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<A1.40.01345.C69E15F4@pb1.pair.com>
	<CAKOpQSyxVL=MWLM80bpr_oXMcxtDNUhyfat3U9-b77kZADAUEA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH46g5+wEsJ4MAQ+rXrXgvTAag+ye7vM2hb+7FFpxFyJvg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKOpQSx_ZbNjKdpaJKfV5ApRgh42y15jKp5-nj=KE-N-Oez6_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<1330823743.2138.6.camel@guybrush>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 17:20:28 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKOpQSwOvteE+RZxdd6mp2yxFd6w=tubtAByx3bcCpvNKeEvMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= <johannes@schlueters.de>
Cc: Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net>, internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0442887c82742304ba609da7
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] SVN Account Request: justatest
From: kris.craig@gmail.com (Kris Craig)

--f46d0442887c82742304ba609da7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yeah your argument makes sense.  The lack of process still makes me uneasy,
but you shouldn't take that too seriously.  I just tend to be very neurotic
about this sorta thing.  So don't let my apprehensive face-twitching about
it bother ya too much lol.  =3D)

--Kris


2012/3/3 Johannes Schl=FCter <johannes@schlueters.de>

> On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 16:19 -0800, Kris Craig wrote:
> > Hmm yeah that's a good point.  I guess the RFC would be to document wha=
t
> > the procedure is; and, if there's not a procedure, then to establish on=
e
> > for consistency.  I'm all for meritocracy for OOP project admins but if
> > there's no established "process" for determining who goes into that inn=
er
> > circle I just don't think that's healthy IMHO.
> >
> > Either way, if there is a process for selecting them, somebody else wil=
l
> > need to document it on the wiki because I have no idea what it is or if
> it
> > even exists.
>
> There is no big "selection" it's more like a "who doesn't run away"
> there's no real "decision power" or anything in these tasks, purely
> administrative tasks. If the current admins are to slow and somebody
> trustworthy comes along and pushes them he gets access to the button. If
> all those accounts are approved fast enough there's no need .. and once
> there is need an RFC process to follow hurts.
>
> johannes
>
> > --Kris
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Lol well personally I disagree.  I was super-stoked when the RFC
> process
> > >> was introduced and I would LOVE to see us make more use of it!  Not
> only
> > >> does it help get a clearer guage of vote totals, but it also forces
> > >> proposals to be more explicit and well-thought-out IMHO.
> > >>
> > >> Of course that's only my opinion.  If other people say they'd like t=
o
> see
> > >> that too then I'll propose something, otherwise I'll just mutter
> under my
> > >> breath and leave it alone.  ;P
> > >>
> > >>
> > > the RFC process covers how do we introduce changes.
> > > nothing to change here imo.
> > > of course if you think that this info would be useful for others, fee=
l
> > > free to document it in the wiki.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ferenc Kov=E1cs
> > > @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
> > >
>
>
>

--f46d0442887c82742304ba609da7--