Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58551
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.170 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kris.craig@gmail.com designates 10.180.80.71 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.80.71;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A1.40.01345.C69E15F4@pb1.pair.com>
References: <cvs-account-2566@php.net>
	<CAKOpQSxaTvC0uAdDB=LDtJHoR1bekgx9RZ0NmTME1Ej1ZMS5Gw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH5a_PgVm6+Ei51oAZgFKvz-Uj038G5P-WyeNS31F4CYtg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKOpQSzrcFngjYWmRZ4cc1qaBNxzXjEGHwcHwu822g=+Myy-gQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH4_CC=HcngR9gFWqWASB9ZVWV_wo7ocGG21Hm7euyybfw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKOpQSwzTCaBUnzU806YWUweDw+HUR5ubRSWJaxD15wde_N3Jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<A1.40.01345.C69E15F4@pb1.pair.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 15:28:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKOpQSyxVL=MWLM80bpr_oXMcxtDNUhyfat3U9-b77kZADAUEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Wallner <mike@php.net>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0442887ca76ec904ba5f0e2b
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] SVN Account Request: justatest
From: kris.craig@gmail.com (Kris Craig)

--f46d0442887ca76ec904ba5f0e2b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Lol well personally I disagree.  I was super-stoked when the RFC process
was introduced and I would LOVE to see us make more use of it!  Not only
does it help get a clearer guage of vote totals, but it also forces
proposals to be more explicit and well-thought-out IMHO.

Of course that's only my opinion.  If other people say they'd like to see
that too then I'll propose something, otherwise I'll just mutter under my
breath and leave it alone.  ;P

--Kris


On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:45:20 -0800, Kris Craig wrote:
>
> > I think it's a solid approach but I've always been a fan of having
> > written policies and clear procedures as opposed to the more ad hoc
> > approach that this appears to be.  I wouldn't mind seeing this drafted
> > into an RFC; I believe the policy as you described it should remain
> > exactly as it is but the neurotic side of me would be far less antsy if
> > this was clearly articulated in some form of "official" policy
> > documentation.  This is part of my longstanding campaign to ruin other
> > people's Fridays with nitpicky crap.  ;P
>
> Exactly. Please, leave it alone. We don't need an RFC for every $*#!
>
> SCNR,
> Mike
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--f46d0442887ca76ec904ba5f0e2b--