Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58544 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 71256 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2012 09:50:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Mar 2012 09:50:37 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 93.111.199.158 mk093111199158.a1.net Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:50:36 -0500 Received: from [93.111.199.158] ([93.111.199.158:25649] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A1/40-01345-C69E15F4 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:50:36 -0500 Message-ID: To: internals@lists.php.net References: User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Posted-By: 93.111.199.158 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] SVN Account Request: justatest From: mike@php.net (Michael Wallner) On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:45:20 -0800, Kris Craig wrote: > I think it's a solid approach but I've always been a fan of having > written policies and clear procedures as opposed to the more ad hoc > approach that this appears to be. I wouldn't mind seeing this drafted > into an RFC; I believe the policy as you described it should remain > exactly as it is but the neurotic side of me would be far less antsy if > this was clearly articulated in some form of "official" policy > documentation. This is part of my longstanding campaign to ruin other > people's Fridays with nitpicky crap. ;P Exactly. Please, leave it alone. We don't need an RFC for every $*#! SCNR, Mike