Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58531 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91301 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2012 19:53:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Mar 2012 19:53:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.113 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.113 smtp113.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.113] ([67.192.241.113:35784] helo=smtp113.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1C/9E-22821-435215F4 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:53:24 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp11.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9B0E7D0EBB; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:53:21 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp11.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 60677D0439; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:53:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4F512530.1020609@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:53:20 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yasuo Ohgaki CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <9832D59F-4388-4D50-8D37-A3F74516D51E@stefan-marr.de> <4F507B14.8060002@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] HEADS UP: 5.4 branch is open again From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I'll work on the patch for strict session patch so that both > PHP 5.4 and 5.3 has the same functionality. OK, do you have the latest patch for that? I remember originally it involved some non-BC changes and there were other questions, but I'd like to see the final one. In general, if there's no BC issues, I think it may be OK, but let's see the final patch. > I've also added 2 new escape functions to pgsql in trunk > a while ago, pg_escape_literal()/pg_escape_identifier(). > Is it okay to merge 5.4 branch also? Should be ok, please send me the commit to review. If it doesn't change any structures just adds functions it should be fine. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227