Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58482 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 58860 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2012 13:22:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Mar 2012 13:22:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:48654] helo=mail-gx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FC/AF-11220-C99C05F4 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 08:22:36 -0500 Received: by ggmb2 with SMTP id b2so154066ggm.29 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 05:22:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of pierre.php@gmail.com designates 10.236.182.2 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.182.2; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of pierre.php@gmail.com designates 10.236.182.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=pierre.php@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.182.2]) by 10.236.182.2 with SMTP id n2mr13665339yhm.11.1330694553836 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 05:22:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UhwaEI5z8Ody8Th9fBzyB4SjRPgAtRRoRwBAGe4UyrU=; b=QPwP5rbqu9mRnkXmUqdf6n0P+bNZ3e5Y4qjSgFuqWoRPZlzcUEcmNwFgY+Ro99DWh0 qSCcYzvo2GfFbUOpbDeQl1wMMUow5yAf6Y9p7q5UNBzroL51WO0LrQsKXtWE8ijRzVMm d/Rr12ehJZmuOactChS33qZqLFiggTfO9sJ31VnIkKyppUq3KQaYtih3M8r8gBONvW8Z gduIJAel4PjbbQ06xIJEB9jn7Opa/VyxuaHCuL5zHkvNsdspqpHP4TN+Y0tzPtVuCJbJ UrpeOEaolHlADPTl+ImXj4qfuVPAElUDhYY+Q4kZ41ThEO4O96RrGR3lJR6pyO+YUrMX CPew== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.182.2 with SMTP id n2mr10801974yhm.11.1330694553616; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 05:22:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.146.221.14 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 05:22:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:22:33 +0100 Message-ID: To: Adam Harvey Cc: Gustavo Lopes , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] discussions, about a 5.3 EOL From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) btw, thanks for those who keep the discussion focused on 5.3 EOL :-) For the votes, the votes phase will begin next week :) On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Adam Harvey wrote: > On 2 March 2012 21:05, Gustavo Lopes wrote: >> Fair enough. Option #1 seems the most appropriate then. The others seem too >> drastic to implement with such short notice. > > +1. We can't drop bug fixes immediately without warning, and I don't > think the overhead of backporting security fixes is too onerous for > one additional year, particularly in light of how significant a > release PHP 5.3 was. > > Adam -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org