Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58481
Return-Path: <adam@adamharvey.name>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 57036 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2012 13:13:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 2 Mar 2012 13:13:00 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam@adamharvey.name; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adam@adamharvey.name; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain adamharvey.name designates 209.85.210.170 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam@adamharvey.name
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.170 mail-iy0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.210.170] ([209.85.210.170:52311] helo=mail-iy0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 36/5F-11220-B57C05F4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 08:13:00 -0500
Received: by iaeh11 with SMTP id h11so2545432iae.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 05:12:57 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of adam@adamharvey.name designates 10.42.174.71 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.42.174.71;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of adam@adamharvey.name designates 10.42.174.71 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=adam@adamharvey.name; dkim=pass header.i=adam@adamharvey.name
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.42.174.71])
        by 10.42.174.71 with SMTP id u7mr6662996icz.44.1330693977732 (num_hops = 1);
        Fri, 02 Mar 2012 05:12:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=adamharvey.name; s=google;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=SlKHTYAV5DeF9s5Kbdl/OxTu1ZvD9LuCsatjtiETkrw=;
        b=JPbdMXTcbG+9I2eyW9kx56InEhEF1QCJUZnqQgOh6tWxLPJYDKu4yhHmNoYzGnKFt7
         V4k1Dtb3AQl4yQMKBg0YP8xk07ySgXLy7N1Z1Wxdoo6q066nRGhQVKIsWhHKCfsLReFG
         NPA6awOUVitSQi9AoqrHK6vS8qfJkOiYlIDSg=
Received: by 10.42.174.71 with SMTP id u7mr5455333icz.44.1330693977665; Fri,
 02 Mar 2012 05:12:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: adam@adamharvey.name
Received: by 10.42.108.137 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 05:12:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <op.wajnzxdzidpuyk@slws007.slhq.int>
References: <CAEZPtU7qpMr9ZTX=+NDus05WA2RZ9A3rWNnHSr8WOBXjqbp4VQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <op.wajnk8ssidpuyk@slws007.slhq.int> <CAEZPtU7R0hgW+7CEzUzu4k+qmjSe7i8xN_pfbkcsHna4Ua76MA@mail.gmail.com>
 <op.wajnzxdzidpuyk@slws007.slhq.int>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 21:12:35 +0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: WeW3MOIMNeAaz2aOuu0tCo1_PXs
Message-ID: <CADajX4CBvXCeJgee1dkWqV06uSvWEgjbHJXUAntQGS9Zcm7drw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt>
Cc: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlHp7kMWy6WhaHVe+griNNwgUK4AkDzlr707qFRH9HhaVBkTuwOhU11QtMiqJ4mjBh22K8+
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] discussions, about a 5.3 EOL
From: aharvey@php.net (Adam Harvey)

On 2 March 2012 21:05, Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt> wrote:
> Fair enough. Option #1 seems the most appropriate then. The others seem too
> drastic to implement with such short notice.

+1. We can't drop bug fixes immediately without warning, and I don't
think the overhead of backporting security fixes is too onerous for
one additional year, particularly in light of how significant a
release PHP 5.3 was.

Adam