Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58472 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 44471 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2012 12:47:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Mar 2012 12:47:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.170 mail-yx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.170] ([209.85.213.170:51581] helo=mail-yx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 71/9C-11220-961C05F4 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 07:47:38 -0500 Received: by yenl5 with SMTP id l5so807287yen.29 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 04:47:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of pierre.php@gmail.com designates 10.236.178.72 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.178.72; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of pierre.php@gmail.com designates 10.236.178.72 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=pierre.php@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.178.72]) by 10.236.178.72 with SMTP id e48mr13139916yhm.28.1330692455490 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 04:47:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Fwz4Z/j2sTZW5yx5+45YjPqhehfh+AbJRf9sYs1mvS8=; b=RR/MLQRY8njLCcRTozcA/Pa91JJsIosHCvKdxwhKWNkb85Xx0nQogknOuWu0T8Hbev mY8tapjrjRinac/MMb8WC6HK28wKt47TMO3B4FmtsfnoPfbxI8okg1Uc36hp/mqUmlvC QLDanj0o/prHbtuwnB6u+Uj08jRQj5eM47DESjot2ZHeGj+tuwW4ozzDcF7jjIe+YPyI TXGBzUlv5eGJXjgPMDJfgERN0wJvmz6pJM6DnJbcydolLbWeXXIztco9cyOgzUtjLw4R auv9z4loWa7bnQA0U+SA3MQYgeX6UC28g9V7jO6/Ij+R8I2D+wXtgXJMajFBDOlgjKAX 44OA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.178.72 with SMTP id e48mr10388583yhm.28.1330692455439; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 04:47:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.146.221.14 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 04:47:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:47:35 +0100 Message-ID: To: Keloran Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] discussions, about a 5.3 EOL From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) fixed On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Keloran wrote: > isnt option3 and option1 the same ? (unless i cant read properlly {very > possible}) > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: >> >> hi, >> >> It should have been done before 5.4.0 was out, but better late than never. >> >> I put together four options here: >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php53eol >> >> I'm in favor of option #1, as it gives enough time to our users to >> migrate by reducing the maintenance period to only one year. >> >> Suggestions or comments welcome, >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Pierre >> >> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> > -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org