Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58324 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 65298 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2012 08:18:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Feb 2012 08:18:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:48693] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 76/3A-36673-C6FDD4F4 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:18:53 -0500 Received: by ghbg2 with SMTP id g2so2597679ghb.29 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:18:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of pierre.php@gmail.com designates 10.236.178.72 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.178.72; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of pierre.php@gmail.com designates 10.236.178.72 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=pierre.php@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.178.72]) by 10.236.178.72 with SMTP id e48mr33256474yhm.28.1330503530305 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:18:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nRixPYdzoc/N+n3ODZ1YgO3EYDWCNhCMdfUSzgbyvCo=; b=BfqMjues2QslmokIq75mtUacVI+EJ1IPSWHtRHywaTn2bE3XSFjbrW3dCgcnZ1EgWH M/qIJQffdls692eTaoQgAJtKindPGXIF5VwtAOO/agaLDBE/kIYGguoNI9qUIgrl2sUH KCrzQfiwgeqXjLpW6T287JH2JLUO0aBY2BcmM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.178.72 with SMTP id e48mr25229769yhm.28.1330503530055; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:18:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.146.221.14 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:18:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F4D5535.7000309@rowe-clan.net> References: <5a1d155ad465d1ec2e6461f5347d859f.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> <4F4BF1C6.8010104@rowe-clan.net> <4F4C23CB.30402@oracle.com> <4F4D05FE.607@rowe-clan.net> <4F4D2EBA.6000409@oracle.com> <4F4D49ED.2020104@php.net> <4F4D5535.7000309@rowe-clan.net> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:18:49 +0100 Message-ID: To: "William A. Rowe Jr." Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl, zts, non-zts, fastcgi and Apache From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi Bill, On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 2/28/2012 3:41 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: >> On 02/28/2012 02:44 PM, Christopher Jones wrote: >>> Build PHP with ZTS enabled by default. Allow it to be explicitly >>> disabled during 'configure' >> >> =A0Why punish everyone by default because of Apache? Does not make sense= to >> =A0me. > > What is so difficult to grok about Nothing, but it is easier to get a point when the rhetorical comments are removed :) > =A01. setting up php-cgi to use fastcgi as the httpd default. > > =A02. having parallel non-zts and zts installs of php (notably with only > =A0 =A0non-zts cli and cgi sapi's) with two different lib paths. =A0Multi= ply > =A0 =A0by two again if you have parallel i686 and x86_64 installs. > > All of these are packager's questions anyways, as so few users do this > for themself, most hosters aren't rebuilding php either. Right, and that's a rather big change, package wised. While the lbraries (systems) are the same, at lest for 99.99% of them. There are a few which can be built in TS or not TS mode but I don't think it is worth it. > PHP would be a much nicer, friendly and more civilized development list > if it borrowed only one phrase from the Perl community; TMTOWTDI. Civilized sounds very wrong in this context, or in general these days. Cheers, --=20 Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org