Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58251 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4767 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2012 16:06:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Feb 2012 16:06:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tom@punkave.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tom@punkave.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain punkave.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tom@punkave.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:37749] helo=mail-gx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 86/01-34356-56BFC4F4 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:06:00 -0500 Received: by ggki2 with SMTP id i2so2919392ggk.29 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:05:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of tom@punkave.com designates 10.50.155.202 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.155.202; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of tom@punkave.com designates 10.50.155.202 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=tom@punkave.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.50.155.202]) by 10.50.155.202 with SMTP id vy10mr22987395igb.8.1330445153585 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:05:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.155.202 with SMTP id vy10mr18673180igb.8.1330445153521; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:05:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.108.135 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:05:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5a1d155ad465d1ec2e6461f5347d859f.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> <4F4BF1C6.8010104@rowe-clan.net> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:05:53 -0500 Message-ID: To: jpauli Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmwGColHAVj4YvUVT6ODxvY7wEuvjyjK1lDqnxJOHHETXUlQ0+t4n13C1wvBgZi7n6VQeda Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] pecl, zts, non-zts, fastcgi and Apache From: tom@punkave.com (Tom Boutell) On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:41 AM, jpauli wrote: > Actually, the true story for performance is to kill Apache and let Lighttpd > or NginX do the job, with a pool of fcgi/fpm PHP processes I'd like to ask you whether it really makes much difference to use Lighttpd or NginX as opposed to Apache with the worker thread MPM, but at that point we are officially way off topic (: I think that in terms of general architecture, and in terms of what to do with PHP, those three options are basically the same option. I haven't studied FPM yet as I haven't felt a need for its advertised advantages over the traditional FastCGI support in the CGI SAPI yet. I will check out the apache worker and PHP article, thanks. -- Tom Boutell P'unk Avenue 215 755 1330 punkave.com window.punkave.com