Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58210 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85739 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2012 22:35:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Feb 2012 22:35:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johncrenshaw@priacta.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johncrenshaw@priacta.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain priacta.com designates 64.95.72.244 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johncrenshaw@priacta.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.95.72.244 mxout.myoutlookonline.com Received: from [64.95.72.244] ([64.95.72.244:15368] helo=mxout.myoutlookonline.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 3F/F1-11273-5350C4F4 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:35:33 -0500 Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5FF7E713C; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:35:30 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at mail.lan Received: from HUB023.mail.lan (unknown [10.110.2.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09297E6E38; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:35:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from MAILR001.mail.lan ([10.110.18.27]) by HUB023.mail.lan ([10.110.17.23]) with mapi; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:35:25 -0500 To: Kris Craig CC: Anthony Ferrara , Ferenc Kovacs , Michael Morris , "internals@lists.php.net" Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:35:25 -0500 Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] Scalar type hinting Thread-Index: Acz1n5Zny7oGiYg2T+2LnXVk0Cfh6gAACmWA Message-ID: References: <1330357150.2159.30.camel@guybrush> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Scalar type hinting From: johncrenshaw@priacta.com (John Crenshaw) > Would "firm" work better? >=20 > --Kris As a working name that would be fine. Of course, if this discussion moves t= o a sub-group that becomes less critical since it would be less likely for = people to jump in the middle and misunderstand the terms. John Crenshaw Priacta, Inc.