Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58183 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 43800 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2012 19:50:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Feb 2012 19:50:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ceo@l-i-e.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ceo@l-i-e.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain l-i-e.com designates 67.139.134.202 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ceo@l-i-e.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.139.134.202 o2.hostbaby.com FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.3) (2) Received: from [67.139.134.202] ([67.139.134.202:4505] helo=o2.hostbaby.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CF/13-29394-98EDB4F4 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:50:34 -0500 Received: (qmail 58700 invoked by uid 98); 27 Feb 2012 19:50:34 -0000 Received: from localhost by o2.hostbaby.com (envelope-from , uid 1013) with qmail-scanner-2.05 ( Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.03718 secs); 27 Feb 2012 19:50:34 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO www.l-i-e.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Feb 2012 19:50:34 -0000 Received: from webmail (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com) by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:50:34 -0600 Message-ID: <9f7d8dbae76f3f8777c6bbd46f2f7095.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1330357150.2159.30.camel@guybrush> <99c7c5e9aacb0d87aba5894dc32b320c.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:50:34 -0600 To: "internals@lists.php.net" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Scalar type hinting From: ceo@l-i-e.com ("Richard Lynch") On Mon, February 27, 2012 1:22 pm, Kris Craig wrote: > Now that you've voiced your opposition, can we please dedicate this > topic > to discussing how this can be done? If you think we're wasting our > time, > then ok; it's our time to waste. I'd be happy to take you up on your > challenge to try to implement this, but first we have to brainstorm > what > exactly we'll be doing. And that'll be much easier if we don't have > to > keep sifting through duplicate posts about why this is a bad idea. > Let's > just set that aside for now so we can brainstorm. Last post on this topic: Would you please consider creating a separate list or wiki page or incomplete RFC, so that those of us who consider the discussion fruitless from past experience can ignore it until it crystallizes a bit more? A weekly update to the list, or even daily, of the progress would be quite reasonable, and keep everybody in the loop, without the details and less "flames". I truly believe this will be a more constructive use of your time, and ours, or I would not ask it of you. Thanks! -- brain cancer update: http://richardlynch.blogspot.com/search/label/brain%20tumor Donate: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FS9NLTNEEKWBE