Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58105 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89599 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2012 01:21:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Feb 2012 01:21:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=kris.craig@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=kris.craig@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: kris.craig@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.54 mail-ww0-f54.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.54] ([74.125.82.54:61858] helo=mail-ww0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 29/28-40985-39ADA4F4 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:21:24 -0500 Received: by wgbdq12 with SMTP id dq12so3361942wgb.11 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:21:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kris.craig@gmail.com designates 10.180.24.4 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.24.4; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kris.craig@gmail.com designates 10.180.24.4 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kris.craig@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=kris.craig@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.24.4]) by 10.180.24.4 with SMTP id q4mr2490794wif.7.1330305681115 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:21:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VwrqwmUHAPHlSuhOtFf4bj38qYHG8jwGqpU/vgb5u8U=; b=eaftLwf3dzyDUoZO1z79xwsTZJ4DkezmO86Xy5cflRtRJXzD3bKUPQR4ME/AbMwK9T UfLfunbZcj1wvX7n+7mzy4WAtQ1IcBreuBIZ13adu+iB007PA7bgrY1DTHnlrfOJnsWX YC3YVSga5z98p46wiJaqzgjEnd/eNH8/KEpHY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.24.4 with SMTP id q4mr1943905wif.7.1330305681061; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:21:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.75.146 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:21:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F47E90E.9040701@oracle.com> <4F47EBBE.2010202@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:21:21 -0800 Message-ID: To: Adam Harvey Cc: Gustavo Lopes , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043be1c68ff6d704b9e7eddc Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache 2.4 support in PHP 5.4.0? From: kris.craig@gmail.com (Kris Craig) --f46d043be1c68ff6d704b9e7eddc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 So long as that release note clarifies that this patch has NOT yet gone through the QA cycle and that, therefore, you use it at your own risk; then I have no objection to that approach. --Kris On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Adam Harvey wrote: > On 25 February 2012 04:02, Gustavo Lopes wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:57:50 +0100, Stas Malyshev < > smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> > > wrote: > > > >>> If you're planning to have a PHP 5.4 RC9, should Apache 2.4 support be > >>> included? This would reduce any negative user sentiment that "PHP 5.4 > >>> doesn't even support the latest Apache". > >> > >> > >> Latest Apache is about 3 days old now :) > >> [...] > >> > >> > >>> > >>> There is a patch attached to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61172 > >>> It needs review and wider testing. > >> > >> > >> [...] > > > > > > In any case, I think a release note pointing to this issue and the > > provisional solution would be a good idea. > > +1. Release note + link to the patch (and a request for people who > have it work/not work to give feedback) is fine, I think. > > Adam > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --f46d043be1c68ff6d704b9e7eddc--