Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58032 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 49819 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2012 21:44:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Feb 2012 21:44:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 207.97.245.153 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 207.97.245.153 smtp153.iad.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [207.97.245.153] ([207.97.245.153:46374] helo=smtp153.iad.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0D/0D-17132-3A4084F4 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:44:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp35.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EBB592C8262; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:44:00 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp35.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 7E2092C834D; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:44:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4F48049F.80203@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:43:59 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Reindl Harald CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4F47E90E.9040701@oracle.com> <4F47EBBE.2010202@sugarcrm.com> <4F4802DC.8050101@thelounge.net> In-Reply-To: <4F4802DC.8050101@thelounge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache 2.4 support in PHP 5.4.0? From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > no because both PHP 5.4 and Apache 2.4 was devel-versions for a long time It may be anywhere "for a long time", but it was raised here first time today, as far as I know. It's too late for 5.4.0, there's no point talking about it, this ship has sailed. But for the future, if you (not meaning you personally but in general anybody reading this) care about some feature and want it in, the right way to do it is to raise the issue as early as possible. If the issue is raised in RC8, unless it's a remotely exploitable security hole, it pretty much guarantees it won't be in the release. If it's late then it's late. Trunk is the right place to go with new features. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227