Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:58016
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kris.craig@gmail.com designates 10.216.132.94 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.216.132.94;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F47EEE3.90108@oracle.com>
References: <4F47E90E.9040701@oracle.com>
	<4F47EBBE.2010202@sugarcrm.com>
	<4F47EEE3.90108@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:20:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKOpQSy56aJ7YEbBCVWuAGd_dMbB9G-GnzPpGp-iH_sXp=SM+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Jones <christopher.jones@oracle.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6da7d642f76f604b9bb7d10
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache 2.4 support in PHP 5.4.0?
From: kris.craig@gmail.com (Kris Craig)

--0016e6da7d642f76f604b9bb7d10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

These things often tend to move slowly.  I'm bewildered that most Linux
repos still use PHP 5.1.

The problem is, this patch has not yet gone through the QA wash cycle.
That takes time.  The only way to get it into 5.4.0, therefore, would be to
delay it even further.  I needn't remind anybody here that we're already a
month late on that.  Adding any more delays to fix anything other than
critical bugs should be avoided in my opinion.

--Kris


On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Christopher Jones <
christopher.jones@oracle.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 02/24/2012 11:57 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>>  If you're planning to have a PHP 5.4 RC9, should Apache 2.4 support be
>>> included? This would reduce any negative user sentiment that "PHP 5.4
>>> doesn't even support the latest Apache".
>>>
>>
>> Latest Apache is about 3 days old now :) If somebody expects PHP to
>> have release version supporting new major version of Apache within
>> days of the new release I feel his expectations need to be
>> adjusted. I certainly wouldn't expect it.
>>
>>
> I kinda think Apache 2.4 was under development a bit longer than three
> days, so PHP could reasonably have been expected to know what was
> coming.
>
>
>  There is a patch attached to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?**id=61172<https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61172>
>>> It needs review and wider testing.
>>>
>>
>> I don't think it is a critical fix, so it's not for 5.4.0. For 5.4.1
>> we will consider it,
>>
>
> I've no problems with the umpires decision.  Hopefully this thread
> will aid web-searchers in locating the patch.
>
>
>  and for trunk it can go in right now if somebody validates it.
>>
>
> Chris
>
> --
> Email: christopher.jones@oracle.com
> Tel:  +1 650 506 8630
> Blog:  http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--0016e6da7d642f76f604b9bb7d10--