Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:57988
Return-Path: <keisial@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 49554 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2012 22:25:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 23 Feb 2012 22:25:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=keisial@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=keisial@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: keisial@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.42 mail-ww0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.42] ([74.125.82.42:51953] helo=mail-ww0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id E5/2A-18992-2ECB64F4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:25:39 -0500
Received: by wgbgn7 with SMTP id gn7so6083158wgb.5
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:25:35 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of keisial@gmail.com designates 10.180.103.97 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.103.97;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of keisial@gmail.com designates 10.180.103.97 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=keisial@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=keisial@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.103.97])
        by 10.180.103.97 with SMTP id fv1mr506755wib.17.1330035935645 (num_hops = 1);
        Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:25:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=bYs78JN9JI+5rRe2x7JyhyRc8HOa4myVCMSULSazKVw=;
        b=tJxo+711OtO+FQEYinzUD1aF1wGXVUXzT5iaNX+PHnqrR6lQCoZqrdvvHVmsyV+nl7
         zCAQ7q1oRJW/7he6xHx39K1+zk7hNYLuK/z5P4YrvlLTt/L/Jwrqp4LfAALxYldOeJHe
         +Y4mKDb2rsK6SM30Uk8DpeLca1zRNuOqHvFHc=
Received: by 10.180.103.97 with SMTP id fv1mr411793wib.17.1330035935603;
        Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:25:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.26] (11.red-80-28-66.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net. [80.28.66.11])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m16sm12765201wie.9.2012.02.23.14.25.33
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:25:34 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F46BE01.7030007@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:30:25 +0100
User-Agent: Thunderbird
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com>
CC: John LeSueur <john.lesueur@gmail.com>, 
 Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>,
 Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com>, 
 Dmitri Snytkine <dsnytkine@ultralogistics.com>,
 Sebastian Krebs <krebs.seb@googlemail.com>, 
 PHP internals list <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CAG=uTXFQUY=EDb=ut97nNSm+m8sMQNRK-9YPcfb2quaoS246-g@mail.gmail.com> <CABBJUpd7XkDjckY-5=D6B=kouUYMrWvzMVnHR_Hch74oGWM-TQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAO8n+WJrqUguS4FSq==z9rF6iLoz3uXqSLBrrkY6yMBY9DrTWA@mail.gmail.com> <CALtuQzD6f_vcZiGi2HWdP8SSqf9744FucUC+4sX7PnGhOnh+rg@mail.gmail.com> <4F455C96.50706@gmail.com> <4F455E91.2060408@alliantinternet.com> <028001ccf1ab$0b200050$216000f0$@alliantinternet.com> <4F457517.7050901@alliantinternet.com> <028d01ccf230$91d79b00$b586d100$@alliantinternet.com> <CAAyV7nHA_DhyZUqU2=EYDSvCEYmc7MFejsG97dXCoTtaeMurMg@mail.gmail.com> <4F4686C6.2040207@sugarcrm.com> <CAKOpQSwtHvSoSVj8q4_QTte42D588OUBDBQ_a4YB8q=GquekBQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGsnKxbuT2WjsZdiEQEV58HkXzZBTYhzMUx4bD9oosEHF1PN_w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKOpQSzRAD6dVPHPfLXCjDYnd8EMmALegvWUEbJYeCrXp4yKRA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKOpQSzRAD6dVPHPfLXCjDYnd8EMmALegvWUEbJYeCrXp4yKRA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Enum proposal (yet another)
From: keisial@gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1ngel_Gonz=E1lez?=)

On 23/02/12 22:59, Kris Craig wrote:
> Could you elaborate on this?  So long as that setting cannot be changed
> midway through a script or its includes (i.e. the stack must be "all
> strict" or "all dynamic"), I can't think of any reason why that would not
> be feasible.
>
> --Kris
I'm afraid that would create a split between code-for-config-A and
code-for-config-B.