Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:57898 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89545 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2012 22:41:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Feb 2012 22:41:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.113 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.113 smtp113.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.113] ([67.192.241.113:40698] helo=smtp113.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 94/00-23467-187DE3F4 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:41:06 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp11.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5EF36D0F94; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:41:02 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp11.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 29F42D0F92; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:41:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4F3ED77D.1050408@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:41:01 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rasmus Lerdorf CC: PHP internals References: <4F3ECDB8.6030405@lerdorf.com> In-Reply-To: <4F3ECDB8.6030405@lerdorf.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] max_file_uploads INI_PERDIR From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I'd like to add PHP_INI_PERDIR to max_file_uploads before 5.4.0 and also > in the next 5.3 release. This setting is very similar in scope to I think the change is good, I just want to understand - why before 5.4.0? I understand the change itself - though the problem has rather easy workaround, as it seems: don't put that many file uploads on the page if you're not using them - but why the urgency? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227