Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:57851 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40876 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2012 07:13:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Feb 2012 07:13:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.193 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.193 smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.193] ([67.192.241.193:38130] helo=smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2A/54-16962-F990A3F4 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:13:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EC89E3C8273; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:13:32 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp19.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 6C9BB3C819B; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:13:32 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4F3A099B.4020409@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:13:31 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xinchen Hui CC: Dmitry Stogov , Stogov Dmitry , Internals PHP , "stas@php.net" References: <-6357718405742688648@unknownmsgid> <4F3A0282.9040502@sugarcrm.com> <4F3A0685.8010604@zend.com> <4F3A08E1.5050608@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Please expose zend_vm_get_opcde_handler From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > okey, let's just talk about adding ZEND_API. :) But as Dmitry noted, it's only present in one model, so how useful would it be? I don't want to add patches that are not beneficial for anything but a very narrow use case. Could you explain what are you trying to do? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227