Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:57648
Return-Path: <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 94351 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2012 09:20:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 3 Feb 2012 09:20:44 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:51912] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 01/C6-21135-BE6AB2F4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 04:20:44 -0500
Received: by ghbf18 with SMTP id f18so1778146ghb.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:20:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=ZRDLv2gDKggkiAxYGrZcFkSWYRnHtg/2dn5mpawafO8=;
        b=lw7SbHxhu+ssqYndbvdf29PebVmydwLumCjGJui0e/8QPdCX4Mn82+AvrocKnYRcMo
         F6gD6RbB4y8gC4doMqU6gdgcYYYbxtncSxUNp/y0kKbMMbendUoZkCMW27rnNyEz7wN4
         D+5kVjZ1ZKAmIVUSc/3LnqbZ2cEqGKGBU60GM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.37.132 with SMTP id y4mr9653870yha.10.1328260841661; Fri,
 03 Feb 2012 01:20:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.146.196.14 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 01:20:41 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:20:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CADNQb0Xdi-yMr=smWvnzUhbNBTL26xz4UdTTPhMtsmk-AKJkog@mail.gmail.com>
To: PHP Development <internals@lists.php.net>, PHP Security <security@php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Package maintainers + PHP
From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com (Hannes Magnusson)

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 09:24, Stefan Esser <stefan@nopiracy.de> wrote:
> It also shows that the PHP devs seem to not like the Debian people, because otherwise they would have kept him in the loop. I know for a fact that Ubuntu and Redhat were informed.

Is that true that we don't have a Debian representative on security@?
Are there other missing representatives?
FreeBSD? Fedora? CentOS? (or are those two the same as the RedHat peeps?)


-Hannes