Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:57605
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.117 as permitted sender)
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
CC: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
Thread-Index: AczhDA8Kd7o8XUqHS+GHqegP+kqtqQAROx0AABCWN7D//4CHAIAAhQ3Q
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:42:53 +0000
Message-ID: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C9018E972D@US-EX2.zend.net>
References: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C9018E9457@US-EX2.zend.net>
	<CAEZPtU6DbhfxYFFKGuxNBZdv-0iNrEGxoLVh9fdxJOx77qV0=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C9018E9533@US-EX2.zend.net>
 <CAEZPtU6fyKsGkx_D-jc2+JG2V-6_2ROE02iV9Jq+9jv2QxOfGw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEZPtU6fyKsGkx_D-jc2+JG2V-6_2ROE02iV9Jq+9jv2QxOfGw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans)

Optimizer+ is free and packaged in Zend Server Community Edition. Happy to =
get you and anyone else who wants to run benchmarks a copy out of cycle. We=
 haven't put a preview up yet but have it working.

Re: memory usage, I've seen some great results so definitely will be nice t=
o see what others are seeing.

Thanks,
Andi

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:37 AM
>To: Andi Gutmans
>Cc: internals@lists.php.net
>Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
>
>hi!
>
>I could add zend optimizer to the stack but we do not have a license (or i=
s it
>free for the optimizer only?).
>
>APC should join the party soon, not sure yet if it is ready yet. We will r=
un
>compat tests first.
>
>About the memory usage, yes, this is on my todos. I have a tool for that (=
on
>win) which has less than 1% impact on perf so we can compare all in one ru=
n.
>But that will have to wait post final.
>
>Cheers,
>
>On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> wrote:
>> Cache results are of course important. Memory usage would be great too.
>>
>> Thanks!!
>> Andi
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:19 AM
>>>To: Andi Gutmans
>>>Cc: internals@lists.php.net
>>>Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
>>>
>>>hi Andi,
>>>
>>>We do automatic perf tests as part of the CI. Some of the results can
>>>be seen here for example here:
>>>
>>>http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/ostc/pftt/perf/results-
>20120119
>>>-
>>>5.3.9-5.4.0RC6.html
>>>
>>>for a 5.3.9 vs 5.4.0RC6 comparison. There are other in the same location=
.
>>>
>>>We are going to do add some more perf related tests later.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>
>>>On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> As many of you know we made huge improvements in PHP 5.4 memory
>>>usage (enabling higher concurrency) and runtime performance.
>>>> We've done our own benchmarks but it'd be great to hear from others re=
:
>>>what you're seeing with your real-world apps.
>>>>
>>>> If you have any experiences to share please do. Benchmarking is not
>>>> easy
>>>and can be misleading (config not being the same, compiler options,
>>>different version of byte code caches, etc..) so the more data points
>>>we get the better the info re: performance gains.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Andi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Pierre
>>>
>>>@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
>
>
>
>--
>Pierre
>
>@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org