Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:57604 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 2857 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2012 18:37:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Feb 2012 18:37:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:49961] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8E/12-25146-766892F4 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:37:27 -0500 Received: by yhfq11 with SMTP id q11so797238yhf.29 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:37:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=D2z+yKCtX0T1nF6sOmhomm8HCs9Lv5oiUXZm9SVlock=; b=m/aj+WCsM7gf71uHcDMXwVQOmMwXrscyoB/2Sr2phDMMwRgXK/Q0ov2yhYy8DiqOa/ dm0dPhI31ttHLARRJW4PnpqCoeR953LxXnWt0Y+0liMhtsfsIGrQxz3KiXX+nmz94DJs +5K9liZjATmhJxe3IuQxx7r7B//iMA4EclgdY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.80.71 with SMTP id j47mr42553880yhe.28.1328121444177; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:37:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.146.197.7 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:37:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C9018E9533@US-EX2.zend.net> References: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C9018E9457@US-EX2.zend.net> <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C9018E9533@US-EX2.zend.net> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 19:37:24 +0100 Message-ID: To: Andi Gutmans Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi! I could add zend optimizer to the stack but we do not have a license (or is it free for the optimizer only?). APC should join the party soon, not sure yet if it is ready yet. We will run compat tests first. About the memory usage, yes, this is on my todos. I have a tool for that (on win) which has less than 1% impact on perf so we can compare all in one run. But that will have to wait post final. Cheers, On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Cache results are of course important. Memory usage would be great too. > > Thanks!! > Andi > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com] >>Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:19 AM >>To: Andi Gutmans >>Cc: internals@lists.php.net >>Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks >> >>hi Andi, >> >>We do automatic perf tests as part of the CI. Some of the results can be seen >>here for example here: >> >>http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/ostc/pftt/perf/results-20120119- >>5.3.9-5.4.0RC6.html >> >>for a 5.3.9 vs 5.4.0RC6 comparison. There are other in the same location. >> >>We are going to do add some more perf related tests later. >> >>Cheers, >> >>On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> As many of you know we made huge improvements in PHP 5.4 memory >>usage (enabling higher concurrency) and runtime performance. >>> We've done our own benchmarks but it'd be great to hear from others re: >>what you're seeing with your real-world apps. >>> >>> If you have any experiences to share please do. Benchmarking is not easy >>and can be misleading (config not being the same, compiler options, >>different version of byte code caches, etc..) so the more data points we get >>the better the info re: performance gains. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Andi >> >> >> >>-- >>Pierre >> >>@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org