Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:57603 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 1105 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2012 18:24:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Feb 2012 18:24:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=andi@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=andi@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.117 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andi@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.117 us-mr1.zend.com Received: from [63.205.162.117] ([63.205.162.117:60121] helo=us-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 3A/C1-25146-D43892F4 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:24:14 -0500 Received: from us-gw1.zend.com (us-ex2 [192.168.16.15]) by us-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB800C0405; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:28:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from US-EX2.zend.net ([::1]) by US-EX2.zend.net ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0255.000; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:24:10 -0800 To: Pierre Joye CC: "internals@lists.php.net" Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks Thread-Index: AczhDA8Kd7o8XUqHS+GHqegP+kqtqQAROx0AABCWN7A= Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:24:10 +0000 Message-ID: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C9018E9533@US-EX2.zend.net> References: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C9018E9457@US-EX2.zend.net> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [63.205.162.122] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans) Cache results are of course important. Memory usage would be great too. Thanks!! Andi >-----Original Message----- >From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:19 AM >To: Andi Gutmans >Cc: internals@lists.php.net >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks > >hi Andi, > >We do automatic perf tests as part of the CI. Some of the results can be s= een >here for example here: > >http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/ostc/pftt/perf/results-20120119- >5.3.9-5.4.0RC6.html > >for a 5.3.9 vs 5.4.0RC6 comparison. There are other in the same location. > >We are going to do add some more perf related tests later. > >Cheers, > >On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As many of you know we made huge improvements in PHP 5.4 memory >usage (enabling higher concurrency) and runtime performance. >> We've done our own benchmarks but it'd be great to hear from others re: >what you're seeing with your real-world apps. >> >> If you have any experiences to share please do. Benchmarking is not easy >and can be misleading (config not being the same, compiler options, >different version of byte code caches, etc..) so the more data points we g= et >the better the info re: performance gains. >> >> Thanks, >> Andi > > > >-- >Pierre > >@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org