Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:57602
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C9018E9457@US-EX2.zend.net>
References: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C9018E9457@US-EX2.zend.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 19:18:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6DbhfxYFFKGuxNBZdv-0iNrEGxoLVh9fdxJOx77qV0=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

hi Andi,

We do automatic perf tests as part of the CI. Some of the results can
be seen here for example here:

http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/ostc/pftt/perf/results-20120119-5.3.=
9-5.4.0RC6.html

for a 5.3.9 vs 5.4.0RC6 comparison. There are other in the same location.

We are going to do add some more perf related tests later.

Cheers,

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As many of you know we made huge improvements in PHP 5.4 memory usage (en=
abling higher concurrency) and runtime performance.
> We've done our own benchmarks but it'd be great to hear from others re: w=
hat you're seeing with your real-world apps.
>
> If you have any experiences to share please do. Benchmarking is not easy =
and can be misleading (config not being the same, compiler options, differe=
nt version of byte code caches, etc..) so the more data points we get the b=
etter the info re: performance gains.
>
> Thanks,
> Andi



--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org