Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:57596 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57206 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2012 11:24:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Feb 2012 11:24:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lior.k@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lior.k@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.199.177.89 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lior.k@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.199.177.89 il-mr1.zend.com Received: from [212.199.177.89] ([212.199.177.89:51154] helo=il-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A5/05-23487-9F0292F4 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:24:41 -0500 Received: from il-gw1.zend.com (unknown [10.1.1.22]) by il-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5807607B6; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 13:23:05 +0200 (IST) Received: from [10.1.3.57] (10.1.3.57) by il-ex2.zend.net (10.1.1.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 13:23:56 +0200 To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej_Sur=C3=BD?= CC: Debian PHP Maintainers , PHP internals In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 13:24:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1328095482.27965.116.camel@pc-liork> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Originating-IP: [10.1.3.57] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Uploading 5.4 RC to unstable (Was: Upcoming transition of php5 to 5.4) From: lior.k@zend.com (Lior Kaplan) Hi Ond=C5=99ej, I'd wait for RC7 in any case, and with some luck it will be the final RC for 5.4.0. With my Debian hat on, I would wait for the official release, as to minimize the noise we'll get in Debian from testing RCs. The recent RCs all had some major issues fixed/changed in them (which is better to test with dedicated people than the general users of Debian). Kaplan On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 11:11 +0100, Ond=C5=99ej Sur=C3=BD wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I was thinking that it could be a good idea (after current version migr= ates > to testing) to upload 5.4RCx to unstable to begin work on transition as= soon > as possible. RC releases should have stable API(?), so application wise > there's no problem. I'll fill a release critical bug in our BTS, so > the 5.4 version > don't migrate to testing and close it with stable 5.4.0 release. >=20 > Ccing PHP internals to let them know and ask if it is a good idea (the = 5.4RC > will be probably used by more people when uploaded to Debian unstable, = i.e. > it means more testing, but also more bugreports). >=20 > O. >=20 > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ond=C5=99ej Sur=C3=BD > Date: Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 08:40 > Subject: Upcoming transition of php5 to 5.4 > To: Debian Release >=20 >=20 > Hi, >=20 > this is just a heads up that we would like to ship wheezy with php5 5.4 > which is in upstream RC phase now (and in debian-experimental). >=20 > It introduce a couple of incompatible changes (for a full list see atta= ched > UPGRADING file), most notably (not listing minor changes and added feat= ures): > - default charset is now utf-8 > - magic_quotes are deprecated (with warning) > - safe_mode and register_globals was removed > - three new reserved words: callable, insteadof and trait > - multibyte support is now default > - removed syntax (break $var, continue $var) > - sqlite(1) extension was removed (already done in php5.3 in Debian) >=20 > I am inclined to let the current php5 in unstable to transition to test= ing > and then upload next 5.4.0 RC to unstable with transition blocking bug, > so we can start testing existing software as soon as possible. >=20 > I also plan to provide "official" backports for Debian squeeze, so peop= le > can come and test new php5.4 before they upgrade to wheezy. >=20 > Final note: We already had similar transitions in php (4->5, 5.2->5.3, = etc.), > so it's not really a big deal, but it will require some amount of work = hence > this email. >=20 > Ondrej > P.S.: Please Cc: me as I am not subscribed to the list (but I do check > the web archives). > -- > =EF=BB=BFOnd=C5=99ej Sur=C3=BD >=20 >=20 > --=20 > =EF=BB=BFOnd=C5=99ej Sur=C3=BD >=20