Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:57503 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94930 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2012 09:23:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Jan 2012 09:23:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:63624] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 68/B0-23348-71ACF1F4 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:23:35 -0500 Received: by ghrr13 with SMTP id r13so2534009ghr.29 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:23:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FLe2DcdmgNrSFJhLKSP/FhVlHOjQfPpl2IQDg8PShvY=; b=LrGa6Hzfh1nnzMNpwceMTMetqF7EDarK4SDQUnX35noV8UxJ6DKC5TbC64b0/DrGaU Ch8PrTWYx9fkvQdXaH7fJVQoPg6Ngjc2D58APkpO3kbjMzKhklrlpNvm+EvW2DwnRCvk CsKTFYKjeF0ZRou78b+B22cqNrlDTzgClHr0Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.133.210 with SMTP id q58mr20199441yhi.6.1327483412152; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:23:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.147.169.10 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:23:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <55.40.47393.BBA3F1F4@pb1.pair.com> References: <55.40.47393.BBA3F1F4@pb1.pair.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:23:32 +0100 Message-ID: To: Justin Martin Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Change bug tracker "bogus" to "not-bug"? From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi Justin, I'm totally for that, has been asked it for years. Let see what other nicer status we need as wel :) Cheers, On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Justin Martin wrote: > Hello, > > With some frequency, I find bugs which are not "bogus", so much as they are > reported based on a misunderstanding. Usually this happens for documentation > problems, where someone has misunderstood what the documentation says, or > hasn't read the documentation thoroughly enough. > > I'd like to propose simply changing the term "bogus" to "not-bug". This > would more politely and clearly indicate the nature of the way the bug is > being closed, in addition to the comment that one ordinarily leaves. > > Those I've spoken to in php.doc agree. Any objections? > > Thank you, > Justin Martin > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org