Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:57111
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1112271036150.27751@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
References: <CAGMw7vE9t8TimNN8bYXU2zG2fHCoR2P+LN8ZcurREDKPomK1Xg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU5xnhnVdk8Yw0hmxLkdK25TTygFD9Umk5A_ApZgOGVbBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU5smafux16aOq+vpsght5KY_+JacF8mEqusGzYTuptZZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1112241154350.27751@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
	<CAGMw7vEpvpNju96c7OthFa3-r87X6tPO5goYMR3YWKuTkPvSDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6nYTyCN2snxcmOzJ=jULN=HWVROghS2aK6yUj0X3LJ4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALkpNnQ4L2n=ju==eaVUT0_PB_cChjLdLH=KX5LHRgqo-vTXtA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU58zfhk+-DAaUCWmux=bCxF-+DPHwkBbVV8HRr7EQeXYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACwt+JeqyAoQ-e_hwAAwxZizxSnCEEj_W=6H5nyYVtH4xmmDNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1112271036150.27751@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:39:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU78SaC1zSrcNhVpseig4Mo1pDvX8BFXViyB-YW+rTe6LA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
Cc: Patrick ALLAERT <patrickallaert@php.net>, Ilia Alshanetsky <ilia@ilia.ws>, =?ISO-8859-1?B?QW5kcukgUvhtY2s=?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?B?ZQ==?= <ar@ez.no>, David Soria Parra <dsp@php.net>, 
	Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, 
	PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] REQUEST_TIME change in PHP 5.4
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

hi Derick,

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
>
>> 2011/12/24 Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > Right but there is a clear BC break here. And yes I really don't like
>> > how datetime deals with that but it is how it is, and it is certainly
>> > the only case where it fails (or almost).
>> >
>> > On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky <ilia@ilia.ws> wrote:
>> >> Introducing additional server
>> >> variables just makes things inconsistent, especially this late in the
>> >> release cycle.
>>
>> On one side there's a clear BC break which, according to the related
>> RFC, is to be considered as a blocker,
>
> An RFC? Which one?

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org