Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:57071 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39641 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2011 11:01:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Dec 2011 11:01:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:44293] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 97/D7-16446-811B5FE4 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 06:01:44 -0500 Received: by ghrr1 with SMTP id r1so3567874ghr.29 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 03:01:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vW6mievreHCOW2pl7MRTAJG7rYC7F7PUkWneqPWqiGk=; b=ORJeDHlnp4Y3fkHnbNtBOJSBqjlYFKqIL1Mo8Fak1uRaBKeQVvbX0nJVmjZ0e0cIzA JNPmggsxY6Y+NjfVUPEJtWlk4YU0vHbcpsZjR+NnSufP2lpTEqb8O+Z6XeInfvn/CCWa XNq9hhn9ahcttoumnOb0Cg6UY2/LQxH6j6cuc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.73.230 with SMTP id v66mr25472658yhd.61.1324724501632; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 03:01:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.146.204.6 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 03:01:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 12:01:41 +0100 Message-ID: To: =?ISO-8859-1?B?QW5kcukgUvhtY2tl?= Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] REQUEST_TIME change in PHP 5.4 From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi, I don't remember a change about it and did not check the log yet. Would you mind to write here how it is broken please? It could help the discussions :) But yes, if it has changed in an incompatible way, I'd to go with a revert as well. Cheers, On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Andr=E9 R=F8mcke wrote: > Hi, > > > > a bit late to the party maybe, but why was REQUEST_TIME broken in 5.4 > instead of adding a new parameter? (like REQUEST_MICROTIME) > Is the Release Process not followed yet? > > > =A0 - x.y.z to x.y+1.z > =A0 =A0 =A0- (...) > =A0 =A0 =A0- Backward compatibility must be kept > > ( https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess ) > > > It is not a big deal (we are used to it), but it does break a couple of > things in for instance eZ Publish & Zeta Components which will by the > nature of things not be fixed before the next release. > Most customers will hopefully make sure the version of the software they > are using is tested/certified for php 5.4 before upgrading, but from > experience, some will not. > > > Other then that, happy xmas! --=20 Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org