Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:56992
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.170 as permitted sender)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
In-Reply-To: <CAEZPtU6gneOOehrsz-qVifmNxg6tnyLt9hqfnAwKZmfpXdeC9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:28:51 -0500
Cc: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@googlemail.com>,
 PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <159A7CA2-8561-40DA-9434-CAAE12304DDB@gmail.com>
References: <2095305E-D4E3-4D7E-8218-32EE99688E0C@GMAIL.COM> <CAF+90c-Wtok1fnVxokYUFQhbYnMcNDwWWT63F8NDp+JnxCDMew@mail.gmail.com> <2C90FB94-38C4-4270-8C6A-B89304BA8ED8@gmail.com> <CAEZPtU6gneOOehrsz-qVifmNxg6tnyLt9hqfnAwKZmfpXdeC9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Return Type Hinting for Methods RFC
From: will.fitch@gmail.com (Will Fitch)

Hi Pierre and Nikita,

I have added callable to the patch and updated the RFC entry to reflect =
the changes. Please verify and let me know if you have any issues.

On Dec 21, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:

> hi Will,
>=20
> You should add it now, while 5.4 final is not released yet, this
> feature exists already and should be part of the RFC, to be complete.
>=20
> Cheers,
>=20
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Will Fitch <will.fitch@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>> Hi Nikita,
>>=20
>> I didn't add that as it's not yet in production.  As soon as things =
are finalized and 5.4 is GA, I will gladly add the callable type hint.  =
The change wouldn't be different from parameter type hinting, and can =
easily be added.
>>=20
>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
>>=20
>>> Hi Will!
>>>=20
>>> One random thought I had while reading the RFC is: What about the
>>> newly introduced callable typehint? Is this missing by intention? I
>>> could well imagine so (because it's hard to check what scope
>>> callability should be checked on), but wanted to be sure on that.
>>>=20
>>> Nikita
>>>=20
>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Will Fitch <will.fitch@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>>>> Hello All,
>>>>=20
>>>> I would like to submit https://wiki.php.net/rfc/returntypehint2 =
into discussion.  A link to the patch for this is provided and can be =
ran against the current HEAD.
>>>>=20
>>>> There is an older entry still in existence, but this patch is =
syntactically different.  The older entry is located at =
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/typechecking and is bundled with parameter, =
scalars, etc.
>>>>=20
>>>> If possible, can someone promote this to the "Under Discussion" =
category within https://wiki.php.net/rfc?
>>>>=20
>>>> -- Will
>>>> --
>>>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>>>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Pierre
>=20
> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org